5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

94up vs 93down 5.0L?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-16-2005, 12:14 AM
  #1  
Blaze86Vic
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Blaze86Vic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 100
Default 94up vs 93down 5.0L?

Looking for any info on the differences in the 94-95 5.0L HO and the 86-83 5.0L HO. I know there are a lot of different parts on the intake and sensors and crap. But what I'm looking for are the internals(cam, cranks, pistons, valves, springs, rockers, ect.). One thing in particualr is weather the 95Cobra 1.7 Roller rockers will fit under the stock VCs of my 95 HO? Any other info would be much appreciated as well.
Blaze86Vic is offline  
Old 10-16-2005, 01:29 AM
  #2  
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
rmodel65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Posts: 11,808
Default RE: 94up vs 93down 5.0L?

87-93 used forged pistons factory 94-95 used hyper. i not sure of anymore differences

[IMG]local://upfiles/23144/DB7DE92F99A54034BC2F42AA0CF51CD4.jpg[/IMG]
rmodel65 is offline  
Old 10-16-2005, 05:18 AM
  #3  
95whitecobra
2nd Gear Member
 
95whitecobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delray Beach, FL
Posts: 307
Default RE: 94up vs 93down 5.0L?


ORIGINAL: Blaze86Vic

Looking for any info on the differences in the 94-95 5.0L HO and the 86-83 5.0L HO. I know there are a lot of different parts on the intake and sensors and crap. But what I'm looking for are the internals(cam, cranks, pistons, valves, springs, rockers, ect.). One thing in particualr is weather the 95Cobra 1.7 Roller rockers will fit under the stock VCs of my 95 HO? Any other info would be much appreciated as well.

I believe the cam, crank, and pistons are the same 83-86. The heads are different (E5 and E6) so the valves ans springs might also be different. They all use the 1.6 stamped steel rockers. The VC's are te same for a 95 GT vs. Cobra. Here are some things to remember.

1985 was the first year for roller blocks
1986 was first year for fuel injection.
1987 was first year of the E7 head.
1993 was first year for hyper pistons.
95whitecobra is offline  
Old 10-16-2005, 11:15 AM
  #4  
Blaze86Vic
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Blaze86Vic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 100
Default RE: 94up vs 93down 5.0L?

hypereutectic pistons? That sucks. I was always told that all HOs had forged. I guess it don't much matter right now though, since 5500 is highest shift now. But it's good to know that for my future limitations on a build up. Also good to verify the VCs thanks guys!
Blaze86Vic is offline  
Old 10-16-2005, 03:06 PM
  #5  
fordguy17
4th Gear Member
 
fordguy17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 1,538
Default RE: 94up vs 93down 5.0L?

you can rev hypers a lot higher than that.

just be careful with detonation if you run any kind of forced induction...
fordguy17 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jack Weinmann
New Member Area
7
09-25-2015 03:59 PM
tj@steeda
Archive - Mustangs For Sale
0
09-17-2015 07:32 PM
dalefrancis88
5.0L General Discussion
2
09-11-2015 07:15 AM
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
09-10-2015 08:39 PM
Redneck1465
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
5
08-08-2015 10:39 PM



Quick Reply: 94up vs 93down 5.0L?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44 AM.