5.0L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 5.0L Mustangs.

Head Studs Vs Head Bolts on 302

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-10-2007, 10:05 PM
  #1  
ramonspeed
Thread Starter
 
ramonspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location:
Posts: 3
Default Head Studs Vs Head Bolts on 302

I need to get a set of head bolts for my 1994 mustang (302) with AFR 185 heads. When shopping for bolts I found that the price is about the same for studs and bolts (7/16" to 1/2" stepped bolts). Can anyone help me with this decision? I am leaning towards the studs but think that there might be clearance issues with the brake booster when installing the heads. Are head studs practical for my application?
BTW I drive the car regularly on the weekends and run all accessories and I don’t plan on tearing the engine down frequently.
ramonspeed is offline  
Old 10-10-2007, 11:11 PM
  #2  
AdderMk2
Banned
 
AdderMk2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lil' Rhody
Posts: 22,376
Default RE: Head Studs Vs Head Bolts on 302

head studs will always produce a more even torquing than head bolts

so take it for what its worth
AdderMk2 is offline  
Old 10-11-2007, 12:32 PM
  #3  
Gary H
4th Gear Member
 
Gary H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Chandler, Az
Posts: 1,080
Default RE: Head Studs Vs Head Bolts on 302

The problem with studs is that you may not have enough room to get the heads on with the engine in the car. Either way, make sure you oil the bolts to get the right torque and put sealer on the lower bolts that go into the water jacket.
Gary H is offline  
Old 10-11-2007, 04:27 PM
  #4  
68CSTANG
3rd Gear Member
 
68CSTANG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 816
Default RE: Head Studs Vs Head Bolts on 302

My 68 has head studs and I do have to pull the motor to take the heads off. But, I still believe studs are a much better route to take. I dont know if you will have the same issue as me tho.
68CSTANG is offline  
Old 10-11-2007, 06:38 PM
  #5  
ramonspeed
Thread Starter
 
ramonspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location:
Posts: 3
Default RE: Head Studs Vs Head Bolts on 302

Thanks for the responses guys! I think that I will be going towards studs since this will give me more reliability with my boosted aplication. Has anyone had to remove heads on a 1994 302 mustang with studs.I am specificaly worried about clearence issues with the removal of the headsin the future if needed.
ramonspeed is offline  
Old 10-14-2007, 11:17 AM
  #6  
ramonspeed
Thread Starter
 
ramonspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location:
Posts: 3
Default RE: Head Studs Vs Head Bolts on 302

I decided to go with studs. BTW the heads do slide on to the studs with the engine in the car and clear the shock towers/ brake booster so I wont have to remove the engine next time I need to tear the top end apart.
ramonspeed is offline  
Old 10-14-2007, 02:14 PM
  #7  
stang8689
6th Gear Member
 
stang8689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Milford, Delaware
Posts: 5,464
Default RE: Head Studs Vs Head Bolts on 302

Studs ATW
stang8689 is offline  
Old 10-14-2007, 05:17 PM
  #8  
5spd GT
3rd Gear Member
 
5spd GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location:
Posts: 798
Default RE: Head Studs Vs Head Bolts on 302

Studs are more ideal for boosted applications.

Bolts work fine for N/A combos.

You can install the upper studs and slide the heads on, and if you can then screw-in the bottom studs in.
5spd GT is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
uedlose
The Racers Bench
4
10-01-2015 08:31 PM
NYstang
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
1
09-30-2015 09:56 PM
69Volunteer
Classic Mustang General Discussion
1
09-30-2015 10:39 AM
maestro1024
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
6
09-21-2015 02:40 PM
EASTIDEE123
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
14
09-14-2015 03:52 PM



Quick Reply: Head Studs Vs Head Bolts on 302



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:13 PM.