5.0L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 5.0L Mustangs.

How does it compare?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 23, 2008 | 07:50 PM
  #11  
Tberg725's Avatar
Tberg725
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 835
From: Michigan
Default

There was a site that showed flow numbers and the only thing that out flowed the gt-40 from idel - 5,500 was the holly intake.
Old Dec 23, 2008 | 09:30 PM
  #12  
ALMOST STOCK's Avatar
ALMOST STOCK
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,926
From: Calif
Default

This might be of some help?


Dyno Number Trickflow R vs GT40

GT-40 vs. TFS R
A number of things are obvious from this graph. The first thing is that the TFS R made a great deal more power than the same motor equipped with a GT-40. Though 25 extra horsepower is nothing to sneeze at, the extra power was only available after 5500 rpm. Up to 5550 rpm, the modified GT-40 showed some pretty impressive gains from 3300 rpm all the way to 5550 rpm. Time and time again, the GT-40 continues to impress, though the TFS R intake clearly made more top-end power on this high-revving 347.





Here's another
Muscle Mustangs/Fast Fords super intake shootout
http://www.musclemustangfastfords.co...per/index.html

And I completely agree.... nothing beats the looks of a Tubular Gt-40!
Old Dec 23, 2008 | 10:29 PM
  #13  
mjr46's Avatar
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 30,871
From: West Virginia
Default

PERSONALLY i'D RATHER HAVE THE POWER THAN LOOKS
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 01:17 AM
  #14  
cortlan's Avatar
cortlan
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 302
From: CA
Default

Is there any way to put a better performing lower intake under the tubular gt40? or do you have to port lower gt40?
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 07:06 AM
  #15  
mjr46's Avatar
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 30,871
From: West Virginia
Default

port it is the only way
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 07:22 AM
  #16  
AdderMk2's Avatar
AdderMk2
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 22,374
From: Lil' Rhody
Default

I would seriously think twice about running a tubuar GT-40 on your 331. If this is an intake thats going on your current engine, you kinda have to ask yourself... "Do I really have the money to buy two intake manifolds??"
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 05:08 PM
  #17  
Tberg725's Avatar
Tberg725
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 835
From: Michigan
Default

x2 My car already had the gt40 on it when I got it, if I was going to buy an intake it would be the holly sys.
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 05:16 PM
  #18  
cortlan's Avatar
cortlan
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 302
From: CA
Default

It's weird though guys... from all the "flow charts" (I believe that's what they're called) the tubular gt40 intakes seem to out perform the other intakes from 1000 rpms - about 5600 rpms! With my setup I wouldn't need to go much past that rpm range! I dunno? if I got everything ported it would work awesome... correct?
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 05:21 PM
  #19  
Tberg725's Avatar
Tberg725
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 835
From: Michigan
Default

Correct.
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 05:39 PM
  #20  
cortlan's Avatar
cortlan
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 302
From: CA
Default

ok... I think I may try and find one then! exciting! does anyone know of any for sale? I checked ebay but all they had was the upper with no lower? so, If I bought the upper could I buy a new lower that would fit? do they sell the lowers new?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:46 PM.