5.0L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 5.0L Mustangs.

331???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-2010, 10:45 PM
  #11  
88BlueGT
6th Gear Member
 
88BlueGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 15,042
Default

Well there was your swap... you sacrificed gas mileage for power. Easy choice id say.
88BlueGT is offline  
Old 02-26-2010, 09:17 AM
  #12  
Venomantidote95
4th Gear Member
 
Venomantidote95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: alabama
Posts: 1,812
Default

Well i guess if 4mpg will break you , might wanna stop now!!
Venomantidote95 is offline  
Old 02-26-2010, 10:35 AM
  #13  
sn95_331_GT_ yellow
5th Gear Member
 
sn95_331_GT_ yellow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 2,394
Default

im going 331 purely based on the rod/stroke ratio.

nothing to do with reliability issues with the 347 (theyre long gone, and a lot of 347's use a 331 piston on a 5.315 rod).

just in case the engine "has" to see 7000rpm once in a while...
sn95_331_GT_ yellow is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
uedlose
The Racers Bench
4
10-01-2015 08:31 PM
MonsterBilly
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
9
08-12-2015 12:01 PM
fiveohfox
Parts For Sale
1
02-23-2005 01:40 AM
DukeU03
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
6
10-05-2004 12:20 AM
Allen
Street/Strip
7
07-26-2003 05:35 PM



Quick Reply: 331???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 PM.