5.0L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 5.0L Mustangs.

95 to 89 ECM Conversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 06:41 PM
  #11  
ml69bird's Avatar
ml69bird
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 24
From:
Default

thanks, I now agree with your way of thinking. I will report back when all is done. still waithing for my AFR heads to come in then will complete the build and install, so it may be awhile. Thanks
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 07:47 PM
  #12  
sn95_331_GT_ yellow's Avatar
sn95_331_GT_ yellow
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,394
From: CT
Default

Originally Posted by ml69bird
thanks, I now agree with your way of thinking. I will report back when all is done. still waithing for my AFR heads to come in then will complete the build and install, so it may be awhile. Thanks
ugh... get some real heads...

AFR = teh suck...
Old Jun 18, 2010 | 01:22 PM
  #13  
94ford5liter's Avatar
94ford5liter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,259
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by sn95_331_GT_ yellow
ugh... get some real heads...

AFR = teh suck...
Not sure where you came to this conclusion because any set of AFRs are a great head for the money. What do you classify as a "real head?" The 165s make more torque and horsepower in any comparison than the competing TFS or edelbrock head in the same price range.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jb145700
4.6L V8 Technical Discussions
9
Aug 21, 2022 06:37 AM
HRnB
GT350 S550 Tech
10
Dec 18, 2015 09:35 AM
MustangForums Editor
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
3
Nov 10, 2015 11:39 AM
1TUFF302
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
11
Nov 5, 2015 04:02 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:52 PM.