5.0L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 5.0L Mustangs.

A rough horsepower estimate, oh foxbody gurus of the MF.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 26, 2010 | 10:33 PM
  #11  
badlx87's Avatar
badlx87
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 448
From: Illinois
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba 95SN
Pat can I buy a vowel?


?????
I think It means he needs more details. Can't shoot for a good guess until he knows more about the car.
Old Jun 26, 2010 | 10:48 PM
  #12  
65Raven65's Avatar
65Raven65
Thread Starter
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 748
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by badlx87
I think It means he needs more details. Can't shoot for a good guess until he knows more about the car.



I gave the specs that we know:

GT 40 heads
E cam
Cobra intake
full length headers
cheaper/cheapest model Vortech, running low relatively low boost
C-4 tranny
relatively high stall
stock weight
3.55 gears


I mean really, I know there are still some unknowns, Im not asking for a dead on figure, but I believe its possible to get a close guessimate. Not really that many mysteries, IMO.

Back in the day we could usually get within 20 or so horsepower either way. Plus, I thought this might be a fun topic.

Oh well...nevermind.
Old Jun 27, 2010 | 09:47 AM
  #13  
TrimDrip's Avatar
TrimDrip
FudgeDrip
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,288
From: S. Cal.
Default

what time did you run btw?
Old Jun 27, 2010 | 10:02 AM
  #14  
Milton's Avatar
Milton
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 720
From: ontario
Default

The vortech should have a serial number plate on the top of it that has the trim, and if you measure the crank and vortech pullies you could get a rough idea of the boost level.
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 12:08 AM
  #15  
NoGo95GT's Avatar
NoGo95GT
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,788
From: Texas
Default

My guess: 320rwhp TOPS. If he beat you by only 4 lengths then he is not making a whole lot more than you. You're probably around 280rwhp and much heavier. So this is what I would guess.
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 08:54 PM
  #16  
65Raven65's Avatar
65Raven65
Thread Starter
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 748
From: Houston, TX
Default

For anybody that's curious, he finally dyno'ed it (a year and a half later) and it made 357 at the wheels.

Looks like 83gtragtop was really close, thanks. I suppose my guess of 385 at the crank wasn't too far off either. Like I said, back in the day the guys that really knew foxbody Mustangs could take a few specs and guess within 20 or so hp. Looks like we found one of those guys on here.

Thanks again, 83, and the couple others that offered an educated guess.

PS, still miss my '89 GT.
Old Jan 23, 2012 | 09:36 AM
  #17  
5.0kid's Avatar
5.0kid
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,525
From: The mitten
Default

pretty healthy numbers through the c4 as well. I had a 302 with a b cam gt40 heads tfs street heat intake and an s trim which was pullied to make 15 psi at 6600 and I was making 386 to the wheels on a very loose converter went 10.47 at 130 in a 3200lb car so it was making around 650 to the crank at that point when it was dyno'd we figured 550
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
19
Dec 19, 2023 01:12 PM
4cylinderplus2
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
10
Oct 9, 2020 07:45 PM
2007StangV6
2005-2014 Mustangs
30
Jan 28, 2016 06:09 PM
MustangForums Editor
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
0
Sep 18, 2015 12:25 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:17 AM.