5.0L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 5.0L Mustangs.

94 GT 5.0 (slower than expected)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-13-2011, 11:59 PM
  #31  
nitrous_bob
6th Gear Member
 
nitrous_bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: st clair shores MI
Posts: 6,028
Default

Originally Posted by AdderMk2

In reality, the SN-95 was far superior.... in just about every way!
as far as "looks" werent a part of your criteria..........yes

they do stop better and they also....ummmm.....ummmmm... well they stop better anyways
nitrous_bob is offline  
Old 06-14-2011, 12:06 AM
  #32  
nitrous_bob
6th Gear Member
 
nitrous_bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: st clair shores MI
Posts: 6,028
Default

i'll show u mine...u show me yours....u show me a sn95 tagging in at under 3200 lbs and i'll buy u lunch. stock sn95 vert is gotta be close to 4k

thats all im sayin...this is aluminum heads, fiberglass hood, convo pros...like u see in the sig

nitrous_bob is offline  
Old 06-14-2011, 03:32 AM
  #33  
AdderMk2
Banned
 
AdderMk2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lil' Rhody
Posts: 22,376
Default

I'll show you my car on the scale when I get home.
AdderMk2 is offline  
Old 06-14-2011, 07:08 AM
  #34  
Venomantidote95
4th Gear Member
 
Venomantidote95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: alabama
Posts: 1,812
Default

LOL i can handle that I have to drive a bit thought to the peanut scale! our cars weight the same, but i will take out my tool bag this time i think i got you beat! thing about it is my buddies 5spd is 3280. and he has a tubed k member! I`ll take a subway meal! just give me a couple days on the pic i didnt take one last time!

Last edited by Venomantidote95; 06-14-2011 at 07:12 AM.
Venomantidote95 is offline  
Old 06-14-2011, 07:59 AM
  #35  
AdderMk2
Banned
 
AdderMk2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lil' Rhody
Posts: 22,376
Default

I was at 3250 with 17x9 and 17x10.5 wheels, full interior, stock engine, stock K...

I've since removed the 54lb/ea stock heads, gone to a lighter rotating assembly, a significantly lighter intake, and tubular K-member. Lighter seats and lighter wheels.

I can pretty much GUARANTEE that my car is sub 3200 (since just the heads and intake got me there)
AdderMk2 is offline  
Old 06-14-2011, 03:42 PM
  #36  
86gt5.0
 
86gt5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: CT
Posts: 35
Default

There's no way that an sn-95 vert is almost 4k lbs.. My dad's s197 vert weighed in at 3777lbs on half a tank of gas and the sn-95's are lighter than the s197s.
86gt5.0 is offline  
Old 06-14-2011, 05:55 PM
  #37  
nitrous_bob
6th Gear Member
 
nitrous_bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: st clair shores MI
Posts: 6,028
Default

still no pics ?????

im 3160 with me in it

my '90 lx vert was 3600 with me in it. add 150 if you think thats all it is (which i dont) and your 3750. i would say that constitutes "close to 4k"

feel free to prove me wrong tho....but im still waiting
nitrous_bob is offline  
Old 06-14-2011, 07:41 PM
  #38  
sn95_331_GT_ yellow
5th Gear Member
 
sn95_331_GT_ yellow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 2,394
Default

know its not the same but i think my 96 GTS is right around 3300 with everything in it, i took out the ABS, AC, PS and a few other things so ill try and weigh it after i get it running again just to prove that SN95's are light
sn95_331_GT_ yellow is offline  
Old 06-15-2011, 07:53 PM
  #39  
christopher_94_gt
1st Gear Member
 
christopher_94_gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: alabama
Posts: 136
Default

mine was right around 3950 ( with me in it) **200lb.** so 3750 its a 94 vert gt with 9" front 10.5" rears. sticker in the car says right around 4k pounds also..
christopher_94_gt is offline  
Old 06-15-2011, 08:04 PM
  #40  
christopher_94_gt
1st Gear Member
 
christopher_94_gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: alabama
Posts: 136
Default

1994 Ford Mustang GT Specifications - Specs

price $17 000 USD
engine Cast Iron, V8
position Front Longitudinal
aspiration Natural
valvetrain OHV, 2 Valves per Cyl
fuel feed Electric Injection
displacement 4949 cc / 302.0 cu in
bore 101.6 mm / 4 in
stroke 76.2 mm / 3 in
power 160.3 kw / 215 bhp @ 4200 rpm
hp per litre 43.44 bhp per litre
bhp/weight 139.25 bhp per weight
torque 386.41 nm / 285 ft lbs @ 3400 rpm
redline 5900
drive wheels RWD
body / frame Unit Steel
front brakes Vented Discs w/Vacuum Assist, ABS
f brake size 274 mm / 10.8 in
rear brakes Solid Discs w/Vacuum Assist, ABS
r brake size 267 mm / 10.5 in
front wheels F 203.2 x 17 cm / 8 x 6.7 in
rear wheels R 431.8 x 203.2 cm / 17 x 8 in
front tire size 245/45ZR17
rear tire size 245/45ZR17
steering Rack & Pinion
f suspension MacPherson Struts w/Lower A-Arms, Coil Springs, Telescopic Shocks, Anti-Roll Bar
r suspension Live Axle w/Trailing Arms, Coild Springs, Telescopic Dampers, Anti-Roll Bar
weight 1544 kg / 3405 lbs transmission 5-Speed Manual
gear ratios 3.35:1, 1.99:1, 1.33:1, 1.00:1, 0.68:1
final drive 3.08:1
0 - 60 mph 6.6 seconds
0 - 1/4 mile 15.0 seconds
epa city/hwy 18 / 26 mpg

DOES NOT FACTOR IN SPARE TIRES AND RADIOS SPEAKERS FLUIDS PERSONS ETC>




i copy and pasted this
christopher_94_gt is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CS2007
General Tech
8
06-25-2019 09:45 PM
b8checker
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
8
10-08-2015 12:55 PM
Urambo Tauro
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
6
10-05-2015 09:37 PM
b8checker
New Member Area
3
09-30-2015 07:11 AM
treesloth
New Member Area
4
09-28-2015 07:03 AM



Quick Reply: 94 GT 5.0 (slower than expected)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:16 PM.