2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.

Remote Start for Manual Transmission???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 3, 2010 | 01:15 PM
  #31  
Dreamtheory's Avatar
Dreamtheory
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,501
From: California
Default

there is a reason why they are illegal in some states for manuals... go google the pictures you'll see a ton of cars in peoples garage doors, houses, crashing into buildings, all sorts of crap because there is that "one time" you leave it in gear
Old Dec 3, 2010 | 01:29 PM
  #32  
wayne613's Avatar
wayne613
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,597
From: Gallifrey
Default

Originally Posted by Dreamtheory
there is a reason why they are illegal in some states for manuals... go google the pictures you'll see a ton of cars in peoples garage doors, houses, crashing into buildings, all sorts of crap because there is that "one time" you leave it in gear
Did you read the other posts and statements?

It's just like anything else, if it's done poorly/sloppily, shock and surprise things will go wrong. Especially if it's something like this where you'd actually have to do something other than bypass what gets in the way of it actually functioning. The only real difference here is if your local alarm shop doesn't do a good job, instead of having the usual car fire, you automate road-killing grandma. Since they can't force good installation, they can pass laws to stop installs for something all-together.
Old Dec 3, 2010 | 02:02 PM
  #33  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,635
From: state of confusion
Default

Originally Posted by EF 07GTCS
remote starting isn't all about winter driving. living in AZ where it gets to 115+ during the summer it'd be nice to get into a car that the has had a chance for the ac to cool down the interior, espically with leather seats.
E
I understand this point a lot better.

Maybe it's fortunate for me that it rarely tops 100°F where I live, because I still don't like the idea of leaving the car in neutral without a parking sprag available to substitute for the P-brake (or back up the P-brake, should I choose to use it).

Once somebody figures a way to add such a sprag either internally or externally to the output side of the manual tranny, compatibility of R/S with MT gets a LOT better. The thought is free for anybody who wants to run the rest of the way with it.


Norm
Old Dec 3, 2010 | 02:51 PM
  #34  
modru2004's Avatar
modru2004
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 213
From: texas
Default

Originally Posted by wayne613
They do come with an emergency brake lead. Should he have actually hooked one up, it would be impossible to remote-start without the emergency brake engaged.

While not perfect, it can only lurch a foot or so. Rather than Knight-rider off into a pond.
the emergency brake isn't as dependable as you might think. <-speaking from experience.

1280 repair bill when it "jumped into a pole"
Old Dec 3, 2010 | 03:04 PM
  #35  
wayne613's Avatar
wayne613
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,597
From: Gallifrey
Default

Originally Posted by modru2004
the emergency brake isn't as dependable as you might think. <-speaking from experience.

1280 repair bill when it "jumped into a pole"
You'd have to extrapolate, as there's no context there. Was this from a R/S device?
As I put before, were it me, should the em-brake become loose, or simply give me question I'd have to disable the remote-starting. I'd only want the R/S to see(em-brake relay) it safe to start if it were functioning near perfect. Not when I'd need to yank it into my teeth to get it to actually provide braking.

One of the reasons I've now decided against it. It would be extra hassle down the road to either make sure that failsafe is actually doing it's job, and/or disabling the remote-start until it was again. That and cost really. Figuring everything involved in simple cost of a solid device that I like and the additional things I'd need for it, I'm looking at near $500, not including the many hours over a weekend I'd actually need to install it properly.
Old Dec 3, 2010 | 04:20 PM
  #36  
157dB's Avatar
157dB
Cut & Paste Expert
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 13,322
From: NW Arkansas
Default

Originally Posted by Norm Peterson
What about maintaining the required gaps/alignment/adjustment, in an environment where there may be a lot of shock and vibration?

Norm
The gap for a reed switch can be workable from zero clearance to
a gap as big as 2". If you cant keep the gap between the end of
the shifter shaft under the vehicle (opposite from where your
hand goes when shifting) and the hermetically sealed reed switch
mounted on a sturdy bracket up in the transmission tunnel behind
the driveshaft where no harm can ever come to it normally,
you dont need a remote start that bad, now do we?

Just saying, its all how you look at it.
Its a hell of a lot more reliable that the
mechanical reverse light switch the tranny now has.
Old Dec 3, 2010 | 06:34 PM
  #37  
pascal's Avatar
pascal
S197 Section Modder-ator
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 13,373
From: Orlando FL
Default

Once upond a time... LOL

While one can rig such a system safely, it is in fact, too much hassle for what it is IMO.
If I need all those kind of goodies in my car, then someone needs to beam me up into the USS Enterprise and be done with it.
Old Dec 3, 2010 | 07:05 PM
  #38  
bluovalguy's Avatar
bluovalguy
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,747
From: Portland, OR
Default

Another downside to remote start in winter with these cars is that many people dont use the E brake cuz the damn thing freezes in cold weather.
Old Dec 3, 2010 | 09:56 PM
  #39  
soon2bu's Avatar
soon2bu
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 275
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by doode
How many people here actually HAVE a remote start with M/T ? I read a lot of posts saying its horrible and dangerous, but who actually runs it ?

I do, It is pretty fail safe unless someone crawls into the car with a window down and puts it in gear when the engine is off ( read below ).

I have a compustar and in order for it to remote start i must :

Come to a complete stop.
Put car in neutral.
Pull up hand brake.
Remove key and get out of car.
***car is still running at this point ***
Close door.
Alarm arms, shuts off engine automatically.

If the alarm is tripped, if a door / trunk/ hood is opened, the alarm will not remote start.

I walk back to my car, hit remote start, it starts.

Because you leave with the car still running in neutral, the only way things can go south is if someone through an open window, stuck it in gear without tripping the alarm.

I like remote start...lets the oil get circulating for a few minutes before I get in so I can just get in and go.
Good post.

Telling someone not to install a remote start on M/T because IF it's left in gear, you're screwed, is total crap. If you forget to shut off your stove during any point of the day, a total disaster could occur. So are you not going to have a stove at home?

Like the above guy said, she companies aren't all full of idiots, they build kits purposely for M/T vehicles.

Give this guy FACTS and/or personal experiences. Giving opinions, that aren't based on facts or experience, is as good as giving him a sack of crap and telling him good luck.
Old Dec 3, 2010 | 09:57 PM
  #40  
doode's Avatar
doode
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 639
From: British Columbia
Default

Originally Posted by 157dB

How does Compustar know that the stang is in neutral???
Or did someone else do the install?
It doesn't.

There is no neutral switch, but an emergency brake switch.

The alarm needs to go into "reservation mode" ( compustar lingo ) before it will auto start.

Essentially you leave your car in a running and in a stationary manner with the ebrake up before the alarm shuts down the engine.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 AM.