Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

9" rear question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 9, 2007 | 01:38 AM
  #1  
mustanglover66's Avatar
mustanglover66
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,261
From: Concord, NC
Default 9" rear question

does anyone seen or heard anything on these http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ALUMINUM-FORD-9-INCH-REAR-END-FOR-1932-FORD-OTHERS
Old Jun 10, 2007 | 12:08 AM
  #2  
mustanglover66's Avatar
mustanglover66
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,261
From: Concord, NC
Default RE: 9" rear question

anyone.........
Old Jun 10, 2007 | 01:14 AM
  #3  
gothand's Avatar
gothand
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,287
From: North Fulton, GA
Default RE: 9" rear question

I haven't seen anything like this for a Ford 9", but Currie Enterprises makes a "Rock Jock" Dana 60 and it works great. IMO, unless you're looking to save unsprung weight, I'd stick to a steel housing and save the money.
Old Jun 10, 2007 | 02:09 AM
  #4  
mikethebike's Avatar
mikethebike
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 551
Default RE: 9" rear question


ORIGINAL: mustanglover66

does anyone seen or heard anything on these http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ALUMINUM-FORD-9-INCH-REAR-END-FOR-1932-FORD-OTHERS
Can't think of the barnd name but there are aluminum housings for the 9". But by the time you do ALL that is required to put that thing in your car you could buy a Heidt's Superide IRS.
Old Jun 10, 2007 | 02:20 AM
  #5  
Bentworker's Avatar
Bentworker
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 189
From: State of Jefferson
Default RE: 9" rear question

A regular steel housing is not that heavy, if your are considering the aluminumhousing for weight reasons you would probably be better off spending your money on a Moser aluminum 3rd member, consider having your ring gear lightened, and maybe have your axles gun drilled. All of those would probably provide more bang for your buck.

The only thing you need to watch out for on the housings is that some of the steelaftermarket ones are built like a tank, which is great for a rock crawler, but bad for a street machine. Same thing goes with some of those super heavy duty ford 9" 3rd member cases, I think the webbed one that Moser sells weighs something like33 pounds, compared toa stock nodular iron case at 22 pounds. I ended up buying the Moser nodular "superlight" case, which is 22 pounds and good up to 600 hp (the aluminum one is about 16-18 pounds).

But... If you are going for Bling, an aluminum housing would be perfect.

Peter
Old Jun 10, 2007 | 04:48 AM
  #6  
andrewmp6's Avatar
andrewmp6
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,162
From:
Default RE: 9" rear question

i dont like the bolts holding the axle tubes on rather have them welded. id go for a standard housing 9inch if you want something to hold alot of power then go for the 9 inch with the bracing welded on it.
Old Jun 10, 2007 | 06:59 PM
  #7  
gothand's Avatar
gothand
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,287
From: North Fulton, GA
Default RE: 9" rear question

If done correctly, those bolts will be just fine. The tubes should be pressed in and the bolts just keep it from spinning. If you look at any Dana axle, Ford 8.8 or any housing with a cast iron pig, you'll see that the tubes are held in with a rosette weld instead of a bolt.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tivo304
New Member Area
7
Aug 28, 2023 12:19 PM
Dragonus18
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
8
Sep 9, 2015 01:21 AM
cbird1177711
2005-2014 Mustangs
2
Sep 3, 2015 08:43 PM
cbird1177711
2005-2014 Mustangs
3
Sep 2, 2015 08:51 PM
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
Sep 1, 2015 08:16 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 AM.