Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

1969 Roadrunner vs 1968 Fastback

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 12:36 AM
  #11  
atomsk680's Avatar
atomsk680
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,806
From: DFW
Default RE: 1969 Roadrunner vs 1968 Fastback

id buy the roadrunner because its 6k cheaper
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 12:54 AM
  #12  
andrewmp6's Avatar
andrewmp6
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,162
From:
Default RE: 1969 Roadrunner vs 1968 Fastback

i love the 69 roadrunner im guessing its a 318 or 383 by the price. anyone charging 8500 for a rolling fastback needs to be smacked hard.you can get a dynacorn shell for like 15 and have no rust to fix.run the vin make sure its a real roadrunner not a rebadged something else.
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 03:17 AM
  #13  
mat11089's Avatar
mat11089
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 702
From:
Default RE: 1969 Roadrunner vs 1968 Fastback

Easily choose the roadrunner
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 03:28 AM
  #14  
Soaring's Avatar
Soaring
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,565
From:
Default RE: 1969 Roadrunner vs 1968 Fastback

I owned a 1957 Plymouth convertible while in college. That sucker was red with white interior. An absolutely beautiful car. That is the only Mopar I have ever owned, because Mopar screwed the pooch for 30 years after that.
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 03:31 AM
  #15  
RedMachAndOrangeFox's Avatar
RedMachAndOrangeFox
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 196
From: San Diego CA
Default RE: 1969 Roadrunner vs 1968 Fastback

oooh roadrunner, very rare and you could spend alot more money on resto to make it look reallly really nince
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 03:38 AM
  #16  
Soaring's Avatar
Soaring
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,565
From:
Default RE: 1969 Roadrunner vs 1968 Fastback

ORIGINAL: RedMachAndOrangeFox

oooh roadrunner, very rare and you could spend alot more money on resto to make it look reallly really nince
Rare to whom? That Roadrunner is not even known in the general public, but that Mustang is. Now, which one is more valuable?
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 03:43 AM
  #17  
Soaring's Avatar
Soaring
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,565
From:
Default RE: 1969 Roadrunner vs 1968 Fastback

ORIGINAL: stripes18

Go with the roadrunner, spend the extra $6000 on restoration.
And where exactly do you spend that 6 grand. Give us a list of the parts places you can go to, to spend that moolah to bring that Mopar POS back to life.
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 03:56 AM
  #18  
RedMachAndOrangeFox's Avatar
RedMachAndOrangeFox
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 196
From: San Diego CA
Default RE: 1969 Roadrunner vs 1968 Fastback

[:@] well i am saying i hardly EVER see them at car shows so i thinks its rare -.- but yes... mustangs are my all time favorite car but if the roadrunners are rarer couldnt they be more valuable especially with all the money he could potentialy put into in
ORIGINAL: Soaring

ORIGINAL: RedMachAndOrangeFox

oooh roadrunner, very rare and you could spend alot more money on resto to make it look reallly really nince
Rare to whom? That Roadrunner is not even known in the general public, but that Mustang is. Now, which one is more valuable?
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 04:01 AM
  #19  
mat11089's Avatar
mat11089
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 702
From:
Default RE: 1969 Roadrunner vs 1968 Fastback

Roadrunners are more rare and more valuable and even with my great love and loyalty to mustangs i gotta say again the roadrunner is a bad A$$ car if u ask me.
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 04:04 AM
  #20  
RedMachAndOrangeFox's Avatar
RedMachAndOrangeFox
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 196
From: San Diego CA
Default RE: 1969 Roadrunner vs 1968 Fastback

well soaring. . . Point proven : P
ORIGINAL: mat11089

Roadrunners are more rare and more valuable and even with my great love and loyalty to mustangs i gotta say again the roadrunner is a bad A$$ car if u ask me.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:36 AM.