1969 Roadrunner vs 1968 Fastback
i love the 69 roadrunner im guessing its a 318 or 383 by the price. anyone charging 8500 for a rolling fastback needs to be smacked hard.you can get a dynacorn shell for like 15 and have no rust to fix.run the vin make sure its a real roadrunner not a rebadged something else.
I owned a 1957 Plymouth convertible while in college. That sucker was red with white interior. An absolutely beautiful car. That is the only Mopar I have ever owned, because Mopar screwed the pooch for 30 years after that.
ORIGINAL: RedMachAndOrangeFox
oooh roadrunner, very rare and you could spend alot more money on resto to make it look reallly really nince
oooh roadrunner, very rare and you could spend alot more money on resto to make it look reallly really nince
ORIGINAL: stripes18
Go with the roadrunner, spend the extra $6000 on restoration.
Go with the roadrunner, spend the extra $6000 on restoration.
[:@] well i am saying i hardly EVER see them at car shows so i thinks its rare -.- but yes... mustangs are my all time favorite car but if the roadrunners are rarer couldnt they be more valuable especially with all the money he could potentialy put into in
ORIGINAL: Soaring
Rare to whom? That Roadrunner is not even known in the general public, but that Mustang is. Now, which one is more valuable?
ORIGINAL: RedMachAndOrangeFox
oooh roadrunner, very rare and you could spend alot more money on resto to make it look reallly really nince
oooh roadrunner, very rare and you could spend alot more money on resto to make it look reallly really nince
well soaring. . . Point proven : P
ORIGINAL: mat11089
Roadrunners are more rare and more valuable and even with my great love and loyalty to mustangs i gotta say again the roadrunner is a bad A$$ car if u ask me.
Roadrunners are more rare and more valuable and even with my great love and loyalty to mustangs i gotta say again the roadrunner is a bad A$$ car if u ask me.


