Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

1969 Roadrunner vs 1968 Fastback

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 09:27 PM
  #41  
arkight's Avatar
arkight
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 88
From:
Default RE: 1969 Roadrunner vs 1968 Fastback

roadrunner
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 09:52 PM
  #42  
Aussie66Fastback's Avatar
Aussie66Fastback
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,266
From: Australia
Default RE: 1969 Roadrunner vs 1968 Fastback

ORIGINAL: JBradley500

its funny to read all of these responces....it turns out we are not die-hard ford men but we are die-hard chevy haters....if it said 350 c*m*ro we would all be bashing you for even bringing up such an absurd question.
[sm=icon_rofl.gif]

but as blackLX said...if its a genuine GT390...Steve McQueen here we come.
How many 4 spd ones of those were made?
Werent most of them the GTA (A for auto)???
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 11:04 PM
  #43  
Atencio's Avatar
Atencio
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 41
From:
Default RE: 1969 Roadrunner vs 1968 Fastback

I don't know where some of you guys are coming from that a 69 Road Runner is rarer than a fastback Mustang. Production numbers were almost double for the Road Runner. Out of all the Mustangs only 17,000 (5%) were GT's.
If the Road Runner was originally a 440 car I might consider it otherwise the GT "S" code Mustang will eventually carry better resale value in my humble opinion. I would also question why the RR is so cheap.
GTA Mustangs were only made in 1967. All 68's whether stick or auto were GT's.
Still I would offer much less for the Mustang shell

.


Old Jul 18, 2007 | 11:13 PM
  #44  
stangs67's Avatar
stangs67
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 138
Default RE: 1969 Roadrunner vs 1968 Fastback

^The RR is so cheap because it needs ground up restoration. The fastback is a complete car but is a rolling chasis. The RR needs interior,motor, tranny,dash,all the mechanical things need to be done. Im guessing im going buy the car tommorow and start on it maybe in december. I have a 68 Stang which is 50% done. Hopefully parts will cost me less than $30000.
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 03:12 AM
  #45  
Galactusz's Avatar
Galactusz
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,168
From:
Default RE: 1969 Roadrunner vs 1968 Fastback

I'm a Mustang man till the day I die, but in this case, considering the huge price differences, especially the cheap price tag for the running bird, I'd go for the beep beep as well.
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 01:32 PM
  #46  
68SCode4speed's Avatar
68SCode4speed
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 490
From: Wiscon-brrrrrr-sin
Default RE: 1969 Roadrunner vs 1968 Fastback

ORIGINAL: fastbackford351

It is a well proven scientific fact that people who drive Mopars are in league with Satan.

Go for the fastback

I had no idea that I was a devil worshipper...???

Obviously by my signature I'd snap up both cars but that is just me. (Actually I'd get the Mustang and make it just what you want - Most of the Mopar guys that I know are into numbers matching resto's and I like to do with my cars what I want.) Plus Mopar parts can get very pricey and you will need some speciality tools to dis-assemble the RoadRunner - you can take apart the Mustang without anything special except the spring compressor.

Old Jul 19, 2007 | 02:07 PM
  #47  
RobbieG.'s Avatar
RobbieG.
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 106
From:
Default RE: 1969 Roadrunner vs 1968 Fastback

If you buy the Mustang, I'll take the Roadrunner!!!
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 06:30 PM
  #48  
Pyroburner69's Avatar
Pyroburner69
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 67
From:
Default RE: 1969 Roadrunner vs 1968 Fastback

I would go with the roadrunner as long as you could get parts. Otherwise I would just wait for something else to come along.
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 04:58 PM
  #49  
boss_dude_429's Avatar
boss_dude_429
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 518
From: Andalusia, Alabama
Default RE: 1969 Roadrunner vs 1968 Fastback

in the long run i feel that the mopar will bring more money if you do the restoration right, now no one jump in my *** about it but it is the truth they are rarer
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 05:16 PM
  #50  
Soaring's Avatar
Soaring
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,565
From:
Default RE: 1969 Roadrunner vs 1968 Fastback

Those beep beep parts can be purchased, but at a very expensive price as compared to the same part for a GT mustang. In the long run 20 years from now, the owner of the Mopar will have spent double the amount of money to keep that car running compared to the Mustang owner. Both cars will be worth about the same, but the owner of the Mustang will have 1/2 the amount of money invested. Now, that's my prediction, based on nothing more than a gut feeling and the availability of parts for each car after an internet research.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 AM.