i found this on craigslist http://louisville.craigslist.org/car/374541413.html

 

That seems kinda of pricy for a wrecked fastback with no engine or trans. But I'm not an expert so I wouldn't know.

 

I agree. By the time you get that car put back together you will have more invested in it than it will be worth. We're talking about mega hours of work here.

 

U would be surprised on how much those fastbacks go for. No matter what they look like.


Here is what i mean by that.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1966-...QQcmdZViewItem

 

The second car shown is in a WORLD of a better shape than the first car that was shown. The second has an engine and tranny. The first doesnt. The second one is straight. The first was wrecked. The second is a GT. The first is not. There are reasons some mustangs go for alot and some are not worth as much. I would say restored, the wrecked mustang will only be worth aoud 18 - 23K.

 

I take the GT part back. The first one might be a GT due to some of the features that I can see in the picture ( fold flat rear seat for one). But still the body work and lack of engine makes the car worth alot less

 

On all fastbacks the back seat folds down

 

Not my 70.... Idonot know alot about the older fastbacks

 

They might not on 1969-1970 fastbacks, I really don't know that much about them. My friend's '65 C code fastback has the fold down, my '65 K code (non GT) does, my brother's old '68 fastback did but it was a GT

 

My '65 T code fast back had fold down rear seat