Carb vs EFI
ORIGINAL: Soaring
One of the problems with understanding each other I think stems from age. I was an adult when the first Mustang was sold in April of 1964, so I may have a different outlook on why I think they should not be molested. Now, putting myself in some of your places, that would mean I would get a 1930 something Ford and do whatever I wanted to do with it. Well, guess what? I did. I built a 1932 Ford deuce coupe that had a Chevy engine in it. It had drag slicks on the back and no hood. So, looking at a mid 60's Mustang, most of you don't feel any need to keep them original just like I didn't feel any need to keep that 32 Ford original.
One of the problems with understanding each other I think stems from age. I was an adult when the first Mustang was sold in April of 1964, so I may have a different outlook on why I think they should not be molested. Now, putting myself in some of your places, that would mean I would get a 1930 something Ford and do whatever I wanted to do with it. Well, guess what? I did. I built a 1932 Ford deuce coupe that had a Chevy engine in it. It had drag slicks on the back and no hood. So, looking at a mid 60's Mustang, most of you don't feel any need to keep them original just like I didn't feel any need to keep that 32 Ford original.
My 2 cents anyway and thankyou Soaring for your insite on the 32.
Craig
Finally! That's the answer I was looking for from Soaring. I was just curious as to why the original mustang struck a chord with him. Settled. Now we know.
Mine was restored as an original 6-cyl over the course of 1 1/2 years. I did it all, mostly because I chose not to afford the labor of a painter etc... and I can do just about anything if I can find enough information about the pitfalls. I put it in one large show when I finished it, concourse original 64 1/2-65, and I placed second. My father in law said it was the best driving 65 he had ever driven. That may be true, but IT SUCKED! I drove it that way for 3 years. I'm not going to have 4 or 5 cars in my collection. There's my daily driver, and my toy. And this toy gave me no joy. So what do I do with this nice car??? No one wanted this nice little 6-banger. Do I sell it for a loss? Do I sell it despite my wife's attachment to the car her father owned since she was 15? Or, do I create something that I can love? Since the museums weren't beating my doors down to buy my original, valueless car, and I was already waaaaaaaay upside-down on it, I decided to re-invent it, and I have no regrets. There was, at the very least, one car right here in town that beat me in the original competition. He's got that preservation thing down. What audience was I preserving it for? I've got pictures if anyone cares... but no one does.
I can tell you this; in the three + years that I drove the original, I had a handful of compliments. Mind you, that's not what I'm after. But since the wheels and stance is enhanced, and with the replacement of the puuuuur with a little rumble, I can't take it out without getting compliments at every turn. It's much more enjoyed in its current configuration.
Mine was restored as an original 6-cyl over the course of 1 1/2 years. I did it all, mostly because I chose not to afford the labor of a painter etc... and I can do just about anything if I can find enough information about the pitfalls. I put it in one large show when I finished it, concourse original 64 1/2-65, and I placed second. My father in law said it was the best driving 65 he had ever driven. That may be true, but IT SUCKED! I drove it that way for 3 years. I'm not going to have 4 or 5 cars in my collection. There's my daily driver, and my toy. And this toy gave me no joy. So what do I do with this nice car??? No one wanted this nice little 6-banger. Do I sell it for a loss? Do I sell it despite my wife's attachment to the car her father owned since she was 15? Or, do I create something that I can love? Since the museums weren't beating my doors down to buy my original, valueless car, and I was already waaaaaaaay upside-down on it, I decided to re-invent it, and I have no regrets. There was, at the very least, one car right here in town that beat me in the original competition. He's got that preservation thing down. What audience was I preserving it for? I've got pictures if anyone cares... but no one does.
I can tell you this; in the three + years that I drove the original, I had a handful of compliments. Mind you, that's not what I'm after. But since the wheels and stance is enhanced, and with the replacement of the puuuuur with a little rumble, I can't take it out without getting compliments at every turn. It's much more enjoyed in its current configuration.
As far as the "new generation of performance" or whatever it goes by with those "Fast and the Furious" ricer cars....there are some that are fast, and look decent and the drivers are cool. But there are just way, WAY too many ricers out there that think the new Eclipses, and SRT 4's or Honda Civic Si's are just the baddest car out there, and will whip any "Old, heavy American pile of steel." Yes, I've had people tell me my Mustang weighs so much that's why a Honda can whip it. I'm like "What are you smoking, my car only weighs like 200-300lbs more than your Honda, but has twice as many cylinders and almost 3x the displacement." They're quite shocked when my 40+ year old car puts a major beat down on their Scion, or SRT-4 or Honda, or whatever it may be. I have no problem with someone that mods a car, whether it's a Mustang or a Honda, as long as they do it right and aren't a retard about it and think they're the fastest dude around. I and many others get bugged by the retards that drive cars that are OBVIOUSLY much slower, yet still think they're faster....THOSE are the people I have a problem with
ORIGINAL: Soaring
I built a 1932 Ford deuce coupe that had a Chevy engine in it.
I built a 1932 Ford deuce coupe that had a Chevy engine in it.
ORIGINAL: gothand
There's the rub. I hate the fact that there is a Chevy in every early Ford. [:@] Flatheads forever!!!!
ORIGINAL: Soaring
I built a 1932 Ford deuce coupe that had a Chevy engine in it.
I built a 1932 Ford deuce coupe that had a Chevy engine in it.
Seriously though, like just aboutevery 30's Ford I see, has the exact same Chevy 350 crate engine in it
ORIGINAL: 67mustang302
Cuz they spend all the money on body parts, interior and chrome, they don't have enough left to get anything other than a dime-a-dozen 350 crate engine.
Seriously though, like just aboutevery 30's Ford I see, has the exact same Chevy 350 crate engine in it
ORIGINAL: gothand
There's the rub. I hate the fact that there is a Chevy in every early Ford. [:@] Flatheads forever!!!!
ORIGINAL: Soaring
I built a 1932 Ford deuce coupe that had a Chevy engine in it.
I built a 1932 Ford deuce coupe that had a Chevy engine in it.
Seriously though, like just aboutevery 30's Ford I see, has the exact same Chevy 350 crate engine in it
ORIGINAL: Soaring
So, looking at a mid 60's Mustang, most of you don't feel any need to keep them original just like I didn't feel any need to keep that 32 Ford original.
So, looking at a mid 60's Mustang, most of you don't feel any need to keep them original just like I didn't feel any need to keep that 32 Ford original.
ORIGINAL: SS4LUNCH
Soaring- Do I see Magnum 500 wheels on your 65? Those aren't original. SINNER!!!!!!!
Soaring- Do I see Magnum 500 wheels on your 65? Those aren't original. SINNER!!!!!!!


