Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Early vs Later Engines..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-30-2007, 11:44 PM
  #1  
takeoutexodus
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
takeoutexodus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location:
Posts: 484
Default Early vs Later Engines..

Ok , So what would be better a later roller block ? like 90's

or an early stronger block ? 69-80's

these plans are not surpassing 400 hp..

and we are of course talking about a 351w .

is the roller block worth it ? or is it too weak as people may say ?

is there a difference?

this is staying a carburated set up .

thanks

takeoutexodus is offline  
Old 09-30-2007, 11:52 PM
  #2  
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
67mustang302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Posts: 10,468
Default RE: Early vs Later Engines..

At 400hp it won't matter. The roller block would be preferable since a factory roller setup is cheaper than a roller conversion kit
67mustang302 is offline  
Old 10-01-2007, 12:00 AM
  #3  
takeoutexodus
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
takeoutexodus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location:
Posts: 484
Default RE: Early vs Later Engines..

Also, do you know when the 4 bolt mains became the standard thing ?

Or what years it was offered?

Also, do you know if they have any 90's non dual overhead cam 351w's ?

whats the main advantage of a 4 bolt main instead of a 2 bolt.

takeoutexodus is offline  
Old 10-01-2007, 12:11 AM
  #4  
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
67mustang302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Posts: 10,468
Default RE: Early vs Later Engines..

I don't think they ever made 351W's with 4 bolt mains on factory engines(except perhaps the 5.8 Cobra R's, but I doubt even that). All the Windsor family is cam-in-block, they never had OHC. 4 bolt mains are more stable, but only necessary in very high power and rpm applications. The vast majority of street applications are fine with just a plain ol 2 bolt bottom end. 4 bolt 351W's can be had from ford(Sportsman and 351R blocks) but you're gonna spend over $1,500 for a bare unprepped block, they're good for anywhere from like 800-1,800hp depending on the block
67mustang302 is offline  
Old 10-01-2007, 05:30 PM
  #5  
takeoutexodus
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
takeoutexodus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location:
Posts: 484
Default RE: Early vs Later Engines..

thank you very much .

so i guess for an application of around 400 hp all you really need in any block even from the 90's?
takeoutexodus is offline  
Old 10-01-2007, 07:01 PM
  #6  
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
67mustang302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Posts: 10,468
Default RE: Early vs Later Engines..

Yes. There are people making 500+hp on factory 80/90's 302 blocks reliably, and the 351 block is obviously stronger
67mustang302 is offline  
Old 10-01-2007, 08:13 PM
  #7  
Mr. Classic EFI
2nd Gear Member
 
Mr. Classic EFI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: L A 32548
Posts: 316
Default RE: Early vs Later Engines..

ORIGINAL: 67mustang302

At 400hp it won't matter. The roller block would be preferable since a factory roller setup is cheaper than a roller conversion kit
+1
4 bolt mains?? Ya been readin, too many Chebby magazines.
Mr. Classic EFI is offline  
Old 10-01-2007, 08:29 PM
  #8  
takeoutexodus
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
takeoutexodus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location:
Posts: 484
Default RE: Early vs Later Engines..

i see i see.

thanks
takeoutexodus is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lincolnshibuya
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
9
12-08-2015 04:37 PM
FivePointToTheOh
Archive - Parts For Sale
7
10-02-2015 04:09 PM
yourmom6990
Archive - Parts For Sale
2
09-14-2015 10:52 PM
FivePointToTheOh
2005-2014 Mustangs
0
09-14-2015 03:35 PM



Quick Reply: Early vs Later Engines..



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:00 PM.