First Time at the Dyno :( :(
So I went to the dyno today and I was expecting A LOT more tan what I had. It was an inertia style dyno and it said I was putting down (RWHP)297.8 @ 70 MPH??and 710.9 ROLLER torque @ 70 MPH. It doesnt show a RPM on my paper just MPH. I have a 302 bored to a 310 with all hyperutetic internals, 10:5:1 compression, MSD ignition, full exhaust, matching heads, cam, and intake (eldelbrock) Holley 650 double pumper, 373's in the back with an 8.8. I mean this thing gets up and goes but I thought it would have a lot more than that. I have beaten everyone that I have raced and one of which was a high 12 sec (like 12.9) truck. So what gives.I was expecting like 350-400?? The onlt time I jumped above 300 was when I shifted my self and then it hit 314 hp....any help or does this sound right??
From what i remember reading somewhere, you should avoid them inertia type dynos. I dont remember the reasoning but im sure you just experienced it [:'(]. Hope it didnt cost you too much....
ORIGINAL: 65PonyLove
It doesnt show a RPM on my paper just MPH.
It doesnt show a RPM on my paper just MPH.
ORIGINAL: 69stang390
From what i remember reading somewhere, you should avoid them inertia type dynos. I dont remember the reasoning but im sure you just experienced it [:'(]. Hope it didnt cost you too much....
From what i remember reading somewhere, you should avoid them inertia type dynos. I dont remember the reasoning but im sure you just experienced it [:'(]. Hope it didnt cost you too much....
ORIGINAL: 69stang390
From what i remember reading somewhere, you should avoid them inertia type dynos. I dont remember the reasoning but im sure you just experienced it [:'(]. Hope it didnt cost you too much....
From what i remember reading somewhere, you should avoid them inertia type dynos. I dont remember the reasoning but im sure you just experienced it [:'(]. Hope it didnt cost you too much....
Don't forget that Ponylove, you are talking 297.8 hpat the wheels which should be about 340 at the crank. For a 302 that sounds about right. Give us your full engine specs and so we can get a better idea.
BTW, my basically stock 289 (mild cam, headers, 4 bbl) puts down 190 rwhp, so you are putting down an extra 110 over mine.
ORIGINAL: remicks
I thought it was the drum style ones to stay away from. Where you are hooked up to a heavy drum and have to pull it.
ORIGINAL: 69stang390
From what i remember reading somewhere, you should avoid them inertia type dynos. I dont remember the reasoning but im sure you just experienced it [:'(]. Hope it didnt cost you too much....
From what i remember reading somewhere, you should avoid them inertia type dynos. I dont remember the reasoning but im sure you just experienced it [:'(]. Hope it didnt cost you too much....
There are actually ALOT of dyno machines out there. From what i hear, its The Rototest Dynamometer which can be found here; http://www.rototest.com/index.php?&D...&Visitor=2
In my opinion, its either a Dyno Dynamics ora Dynapack.
In my opinion, its either a Dyno Dynamics ora Dynapack.
You have two basic types of dynomometers,Dynojet and a Mustang Dyno. You are describing dynoing on a Mustang dyno which will always read lower than a Dynojet.Most speed shops in DFW have the Dynojets. If you were to dyno on a Dynojet, you would probably see closer to 330-350 rwhp.
297 on a Mustang dyno is a decent number, nothing to be concerned over and probably rightin line with your mods.
297 on a Mustang dyno is a decent number, nothing to be concerned over and probably rightin line with your mods.


