Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

New Mustang

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 11, 2007 | 09:53 PM
  #1  
1slow67's Avatar
1slow67
Thread Starter
ROTM Moderator
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,158
From: AL
Default New Mustang

My friend's parents just bought him a 68 mustang with a 302. It has a 2bbl carb and he was wanting to upgrade to a 4bbl. I was wanting to know what this could do to the mustang. Would it hurt it in any way or would it help.
Old Oct 11, 2007 | 10:06 PM
  #2  
JamesW's Avatar
JamesW
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,302
From: Northernish Eastish Central Texas
Default RE: New Mustang

Just by itself (a new 4bbl intake and holley 600)...it will help performance a little. It will also decrease his mpg.
Old Oct 11, 2007 | 10:37 PM
  #3  
Jakaru's Avatar
Jakaru
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 207
From:
Default RE: New Mustang

I had a 65 with a 2 and hated it. couldn't tune it right and had problems. Went with a 4bl and love it. Yes I get less gas milage but it's still about 15mpg when I dont lay into it all the time which is good enough for me.
Old Oct 11, 2007 | 10:56 PM
  #4  
badazz68stang's Avatar
badazz68stang
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 445
From:
Default RE: New Mustang

also, actually, the early 2 barrels were not very efficient at all. Yes with a big 4 barrel on there it wont get as good as gas mileage, but it wont be that big of a difference in overall fuel efficiency.
Old Oct 11, 2007 | 11:40 PM
  #5  
knuckless's Avatar
knuckless
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 588
From: New Jersey
Default RE: New Mustang

stay away from holley they require alot of tuning out of the box, edelbrock come already tuned, i have the same car except it came with a 289 2bbl and when i upgraded to a edelbrock performer intake and 600cfm edelbrock carb i had a great improvement in performance, the difference may not be as great in his because my old carb was junk
Old Oct 12, 2007 | 12:07 AM
  #6  
Starfury's Avatar
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,896
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default RE: New Mustang

600CFM is too much for a stock 289/302. You'll get much better throttle response and efficiency out of a 500CFM carb or, better yet, the factory original Autolite 4100 (overrated at 480CFM).
Old Oct 12, 2007 | 12:19 AM
  #7  
knuckless's Avatar
knuckless
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 588
From: New Jersey
Default RE: New Mustang


ORIGINAL: Starfury

600CFM is too much for a stock 289/302. You'll get much better throttle response and efficiency out of a 500CFM carb or, better yet, the factory original Autolite 4100 (overrated at 480CFM).
im loving the 600cfm and i wouldnt consider dropping it at all, its very responsive and its the best carb edelbrock makes. while 500cfm might be better, im fine with my 600cfm
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NorthAmericanTuning
Vendor For Sale / Group Buy Classifieds
5
Nov 9, 2016 11:45 AM
NorthAmericanTuning
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
3
Mar 18, 2016 11:21 AM
chain
New Member Area
6
Aug 17, 2015 08:52 AM
'stangdude
4.6L V8 Technical Discussions
5
Aug 12, 2015 01:27 PM
daytooday
Motor Swap Section
2
Aug 11, 2015 09:22 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:23 AM.