Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

65 conv 289 engine performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 11:53 AM
  #11  
TexasAxMan's Avatar
TexasAxMan
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,692
From: Houston, Texas
Default RE: 65 conv 289 engine performance

ORIGINAL: jlg2002

Your compression readings indicate it's about time to put this engine out to pasture. You can put exterior visual improvent items on, if you want. (chrome this and chrome that), maybe headers. But it's time to sink about 500 up into a 289 shortblock or longblock (probably more than 500 if you have some one do it for you)
An example of irresponsible posting.

Check it out before you take this kind of advise.
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 03:02 PM
  #12  
jlg2002's Avatar
jlg2002
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,483
From: Fontana, California
Default RE: 65 conv 289 engine performance

Stick it in your ear and up yours-ax man. I've got 35 + years of mechanical experience and several ASE certs. Low compression on one cylinder is not ok and 120 is not that great in an early engine. If the man really wants to get the most out of his car, its time to do so engine work. So F--- off.
ORIGINAL: TexasAxMan

ORIGINAL: jlg2002

Your compression readings indicate it's about time to put this engine out to pasture. You can put exterior visual improvent items on, if you want. (chrome this and chrome that), maybe headers. But it's time to sink about 500 up into a 289 shortblock or longblock (probably more than 500 if you have some one do it for you)
An example of irresponsible posting.

Check it out before you take this kind of advise.
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 03:14 PM
  #13  
TexasAxMan's Avatar
TexasAxMan
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,692
From: Houston, Texas
Default RE: 65 conv 289 engine performance

Right back at you.
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 03:34 PM
  #14  
straw1628's Avatar
straw1628
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 151
Default RE: 65 conv 289 engine performance

Easy..........
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 04:41 PM
  #15  
fast65's Avatar
fast65
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,166
From: Oregon
Default RE: 65 conv 289 engine performance

+1, lets try keeping the fighting out of the classics section.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MusicCity615
New Member Area
18
Sep 27, 2015 12:53 AM
labudski
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
2
Aug 24, 2015 07:23 AM
kdryan
2005-2014 Mustangs
7
Aug 21, 2015 04:01 PM
ding56
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
3
Aug 14, 2015 02:40 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:27 PM.