Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

2 stroke or not 2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 10:51 PM
  #1  
firestang66's Avatar
firestang66
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 25
From:
Default 2 stroke or not 2

Well since this is my first headlong leap into restoration I have quickly learned the value of information, and have got good and bad from many sites. Now I have a small issue to work out, and could use some moterheads advice.
My issue stems from-- A: not having an engine for my 66 coupe. B: having a friend give me a rebuilt 351W with electronic fuel injection with about 80 hours run timeit, this was out of a 87 F150. It needs work because it has oil in the coolant, but thats a different topic.
I would love to stroke this moter out to a 408, and keep the fuel injection. Is this 2 much HP?, and would any of the Ford injection parts be of any use? I live inColorado and going up the hill takes youtoo 11-13k feet. This really makes a carburated engine a pig with no power, buta computer controlled ignition adjusts to the elevation and runs optimal. The big stroked engines I see in magazines and on the net all seem carburated.Should I not stroke it and be happy with the power of the factory 351W?
66 coupe, toploader, 351W, 8"/280, being "derusted" on the rotisserie
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 11:04 PM
  #2  
mjr46's Avatar
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 30,869
From: West Virginia
Default RE: 2 stroke or not 2

if you stroke it to a 408...that f-150 craptastic efi will definately be of no use... a mustang efi set up is what you need..but if you put all that power of a 408 down in your chasis..you'll need the suspension/drivetrain for it and any and all supporting mods..it'll end up being a mushroom...on the other hand the 351 with a mild build and you won't have to get to wild with all the other stuff..and carb will be a much quicker route to go
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 11:53 PM
  #3  
flyingfool's Avatar
flyingfool
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 827
From:
Default RE: 2 stroke or not 2

^ +1 on that....stroking is pretty much replacing half the motor too. i dont know about your $$ situation, but a built 351 is deffinatly cheaper AND easier
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 12:51 AM
  #4  
67mustang302's Avatar
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,468
From: California
Default RE: 2 stroke or not 2

A well built 351 with roller cam, good heads, intake, supporting mods and a nice carb, will still be faster than most other cars on the street. It'll still require some suspension and drivetrain assistance though, but nothing radical.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
drfister
2005-2014 Mustangs
11
May 3, 2018 10:38 PM
1987gt40ttopt
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
12
Aug 28, 2015 10:49 PM
SCARFACE
Chop Shop
26
Jun 30, 2006 03:04 AM
mysticsvtcobra96
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
0
Jan 8, 2005 11:48 AM
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
18
Oct 27, 2004 02:17 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:37 AM.