Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

65 emblem opinion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 8, 2009 | 08:40 AM
  #1  
Toastintx's Avatar
Toastintx
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 97
From: Texas
Default 65 emblem opinion

I have a 65 289, when I bought the car it had a 302 just sitting in the bay. I have completly rebuild it. now the ? is should I use 289 emblems on the car or put 302 emblems on. I know that 65 66 didnt come with 302. would it be one of those odd looks.
Old Nov 8, 2009 | 08:48 AM
  #2  
RogerDodger1's Avatar
RogerDodger1
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 255
From: Connecticut
Default

Whatever looks best to you is what you should do.
Old Nov 8, 2009 | 08:49 AM
  #3  
ozarks06's Avatar
ozarks06
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 439
From: MO
Default

I left my emblems off (except for a suble 4.6 on the tail light panel). I've had more than one 'Mustang know-it-all' tell me my car is a 6-cylinder because it has no emblem. What they don't know won't hurt me!

But as RogerDodger1 said, do what looks best to you - it's your car.

Last edited by ozarks06; Dec 5, 2009 at 06:51 PM.
Old Nov 8, 2009 | 08:57 AM
  #4  
Kotobuki's Avatar
Kotobuki
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 671
From: Texas
Default

There's so many of these things floating around with engine swaps and a whole host of other modified/aftermarket parts that you're not really gonna raise any ire with it. At worst, you'll have to answer "You know the 65 didn't come with the 302, it was a 289" a bunch with "But it's got a 302 now". Alternately, if you use the 289 badges on it, people will ask "Is that the original engine/Was it a factory 289" and then you have to deal with answering that. So, really, it comes down to which question do you want to answer more.

Personally, I say go with the 302. Truth in advertising, and all that.
Old Nov 8, 2009 | 12:47 PM
  #5  
2+2GT's Avatar
2+2GT
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,232
From: PA
Default

I say go with accuracy.

Old Nov 8, 2009 | 05:46 PM
  #6  
JamesW's Avatar
JamesW
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,302
From: Northernish Eastish Central Texas
Default

Old Nov 8, 2009 | 05:50 PM
  #7  
jfritts's Avatar
jfritts
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 75
From: Virginia
Default

id leave them off or go with the 302 emblem. no reason in false advertising
Old Nov 8, 2009 | 11:58 PM
  #8  
tx65coupe's Avatar
tx65coupe
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,462
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Toastintx
I have a 65 289, when I bought the car it had a 302 just sitting in the bay. I have completly rebuild it. now the ? is should I use 289 emblems on the car or put 302 emblems on. I know that 65 66 didnt come with 302. would it be one of those odd looks.
I agree with 2+2GT.

have a 65 with a 302 and got these. They look exactly like the 289 badges but say 302 instead.

http://www.mustangsunlimited.com/ite...p?T1=162283+01

If you don't want to make holes, a stick on version is available too.

Those 5.0 ones that James has look good too, but I like the cubic inches emblem better.
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 07:56 PM
  #9  
Toastintx's Avatar
Toastintx
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 97
From: Texas
Default

Thanks guys I think Im going with the 302's
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dokilar
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
15
Oct 16, 2015 08:13 PM
jstrothe
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
2
Sep 24, 2015 12:17 PM
Mr. D
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
4
Sep 17, 2015 08:17 AM
Mustangmalo
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
1
Sep 14, 2015 10:23 AM
Mustangmalo
New Member Area
3
Sep 14, 2015 06:23 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59 PM.