Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Rear End 67' into a 66'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-2010, 12:23 PM
  #1  
chrisguzman
Thread Starter
 
chrisguzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: california
Posts: 6
Default Rear End 67' into a 66'

Guys, I have a question in regards to the rear end on my 66 mustang. Currently I have an 8" measuring 52.25". My buddy has an entire 9" set up that measures 54.25" that came out of a 67' Mustang and was wondering if that would work in my 66'. I know the spring mounts line up but could not find any info on whether or not that 1" on each side "HAS" to be cut or if I could do a 1" back spacing on the rear wheels. If it does work can I still get decent size wheels in the back? Thanks for the help guys.
chrisguzman is offline  
Old 02-12-2010, 01:35 PM
  #2  
dodgestang
5th Gear Member
 
dodgestang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Insanity
Posts: 2,176
Default

If you simply use wheels with a different backspacing it works just fine.

For example...

if a 17x8 with 4.75 fits stock

then

a 17x8 with 5.75 would fit the same way with your 1 inch wider rear
dodgestang is offline  
Old 02-12-2010, 02:20 PM
  #3  
lumpyidle
 
lumpyidle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: California
Posts: 10
Default

I used this exact setup in my '65 with no clearance issues, but that all depends on the tire/wheel your using. I was running 205-60 R14 tires. So if your not running big rims or tires (stock for instance) you won't see any problems. I ran some other wheels in the back for a little bit while I was converting from 4 lug to 5, I changed the rear end before changing over the front, ran it like that for about 6 months or so on a pair of '90something mustang V6 rims, (the ugly 3 spoke with the little 3 oblong holes in it) I think they were 15x7"? Maybe 16", I don't remember, with the stock tires which are pretty low profile by comparison to the old cars, I had to replace the studs with longer ones because the stock lug bolts weren't long enough to go through the stock thick aluminum ford rims. But with the wider rear-end and the different off-set of the more modern rims they fit perfectly under the car, with plenty of clearance both inside the wheel-well and the fender lip. Never had to roll the fenders, hate when people do that. Anyways, hope this helps! Oh, remember to save the parking brake cables out of the original rear-end, compare them to the new one and switch them out if they are different. But yes with the non-stock (for '66) backspacing you can get the size you want under there. Just keep in mind that you won't be able to rotate your tires if you use stock offset rims upfront. Or you could use a spacer on the front wheel, which probably means you'll have to put longer studs in the front rotors/hubs too, which I wouldn't do, just doesn't seem like it would be too good for the bearings to me.

Last edited by lumpyidle; 02-12-2010 at 02:25 PM.
lumpyidle is offline  
Old 02-12-2010, 05:28 PM
  #4  
67t5ponycoupe
5th Gear Member
 
67t5ponycoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,946
Default

You will also need to run the U-bolts and shock plates from the 67. The housing tube is bigger on the 67 than on the 66.
67t5ponycoupe is offline  
Old 02-12-2010, 06:28 PM
  #5  
66$tang
 
66$tang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 25
Default

i did the same thing in my 66 and it had no prob just needed different backspacing
66$tang is offline  
Old 02-15-2010, 11:28 AM
  #6  
chrisguzman
Thread Starter
 
chrisguzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: california
Posts: 6
Default

Right on, thanks for the help guys.
chrisguzman is offline  
Old 02-16-2010, 12:44 AM
  #7  
nba1341
4th Gear Member
 
nba1341's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Upland, California
Posts: 1,246
Default

Originally Posted by dodgestang
If you simply use wheels with a different backspacing it works just fine.

For example...

if a 17x8 with 4.75 fits stock

then

a 17x8 with 5.75 would fit the same way with your 1 inch wider rear
Why would you want MORE backspacing if the rear end is enlarged by 2 inches. Wouldnt that make the wheels stick out 2 inches more versus 3.75 backspacing which would make it equal?
nba1341 is offline  
Old 02-16-2010, 09:25 AM
  #8  
dodgestang
5th Gear Member
 
dodgestang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Insanity
Posts: 2,176
Default

Originally Posted by nba1341
Wouldnt that make the wheels stick out 2 inches more versus 3.75 backspacing which would make it equal?
No.

https://www.rsracing.com/tech-wheel.html

A modern mustang rim (something like a 2001 17 inch bullitt) has approx 5.75 (5.72 is the exact IIRC) backspacing and generally can not be run on the car without a 1 inch spacer because it sits too far into the wheel well and rubs on the inside of wheel wells. The 1 inch spacer changes the backspacing to 4.75 by pushing the wheel out 1 inch. If you put a rear in that is one inch wider and then decrease your backspacing by one inch as you are recommending your wheel will now sit out 2 inches further that it would with the stock rear and a correct backspaced wheel.
dodgestang is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mtgldr
S197 Handling Section
5
02-03-2024 09:00 PM
zsmart
Convertible Tech
2
02-29-2016 08:33 AM
Ryan Fitzpatrick
New Member Area
3
09-14-2015 02:21 AM
fastbackford351
Classic Mustang General Discussion
2
09-12-2015 09:42 AM
Dragonus18
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
8
09-09-2015 01:21 AM



Quick Reply: Rear End 67' into a 66'



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:30 AM.