Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Differences between AT and MT headers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 11, 2010 | 09:28 PM
  #11  
Deviousfred's Avatar
Deviousfred
Thread Starter
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 630
From: El Paso, TX
Default

I believe it would be easier to keep the stock pedal set-up. I will more than likely be utilizing something like the set-up offered by Daze and Rosehill Performance. They have an offset pushrod so that no major modifications will be needed. To make it more reliable and for smoother operation, also consider Mustang Steve's roller bearing pedal support conversion.
http://www.mustangsteve.com/clutchbearings.html
Or if you feel handy enough, F15Falcon also offeres up a nice DIY write up.
http://www.fordmuscle.com/forums/int...rings-fix.html





I will probably be using a Wilwood master cylinder that allows me to remotely mount the resevoir unless I can find a way to mount a triple Wilwood master cylinder and pedal set-up like HenryV.



Fred

Last edited by Deviousfred; May 11, 2010 at 09:33 PM.
Old May 12, 2010 | 12:50 PM
  #12  
Art Brock's Avatar
Art Brock
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 226
From: Laurel Hill
Default

Am i correct in this:

I currently have a C-4 auto
If I get AT headers & later swap in a T-5, I can keep the same headers if I use a hyd cluth setup?
Old May 12, 2010 | 01:36 PM
  #13  
kalli's Avatar
kalli
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,417
From: Cork, Ireland
Default

Originally Posted by 67mustang302
Here are pics. Some of them were hard to get, so maybe not the best angles.

Basically a pic from the top of the driver and pass side to see clearance. Th engine is sitting all the way to the passenger side(adjustable mounts). The headers on the pass side actually are designed so the header tube passes near the frame BETWEEN the 2 bolts for the idler arm....talk about designed to fit. Then from the front looking back, and one on each side near the collector. These are with the camera basically on the ground.

Welding the adapters to the pipe was a pain, since i was butt welding, and the adapaters wanted way less heat then the piping I was welding them too. They kept blowing through in spots and I had to cap them, so the welds there are ugly.
ugly welding alright but yes they fit tight and snug, the vlearance seems to be about where the oilpan is. very nice
Old May 12, 2010 | 02:20 PM
  #14  
67mustang302's Avatar
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,468
From: California
Default

Yeah, the first welds there between the exhaust pipe and those collectors were horrible. The machine setting was a bit off and the adapters kept blowing through(even though I generally needed more heat). The other welds were fine though. But yeah, even with the whole thing not tucked as tight as I could get it, it still has great ground clearance.

It used to scrape BAD every time I pulled out of my driveway. Driveway uphill to a street with an asphalt low curb between the street and the driveway, major high center point. Nearly got stuck on that thing several times, scraped hard going in and out EVERY time. Now I can barrel over it and clear.
Old May 12, 2010 | 09:18 PM
  #15  
LCC's Avatar
LCC
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,443
From: Canada
Default

I have Dougs Tri "Y" Headers for an AT and couldn't be happier. Because the collectors are not under the car you have lots of room to route the exhaust around the trans and keep it tight to the car. Awesome quality.



Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Roxon68
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
17
Mar 17, 2016 08:13 PM
Shadow7874
2005-2014 Mustangs
4
Sep 24, 2015 09:06 PM
trashxtrash
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
4
Sep 20, 2015 10:49 PM
BrantleyS550
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
0
Sep 14, 2015 04:18 PM
Boostaddict
Lethal Performance
2
Sep 8, 2015 09:56 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:38 PM.