Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

alignment issues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 07:43 AM
  #11  
kalli's Avatar
kalli
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,417
From: Cork, Ireland
Default why not steal a thread

on that note:
I measured toe in with a tape measurer, and camber with a tool (basically and angle finder that works in such a way that you can dial in the degrees and you know if you hit by checking the water bubble. very primitive gauge.

but what I don't get is how am I supposed to set caster? i can't possibly hold that tool onto the spindle ?!

IGNORE .. . I just read a manual from a similar tool. turnning the wheel is the trick (well I could have come up with that myself ...)
At the garage I learned in we had a stand with those triple mirrors ...

Last edited by kalli; Jun 22, 2010 at 07:50 AM.
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 12:25 PM
  #12  
67mustang302's Avatar
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,468
From: California
Default

Or just put as much + caster in it as possible that still let you steer it.

+ caster has only 1 negative side effect, increased steering effort.
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 01:16 PM
  #13  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,635
From: state of confusion
Default

There is another effect, involving bumpsteer.

Changing caster very far from the preferred OE setting will raise or lower the steering arm and outer tierod height, and the arc that the pivot follows during suspension travel will change. Sometimes this can help reduce an excessive amount of bumpsteer if the caster change puts the tierod inclination closer to where it should be for zero b/steer, but it's just as likely to make it worse.


Norm
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 05:12 PM
  #14  
67mustang302's Avatar
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,468
From: California
Default

True, but if the suspension is modified/lowered, then bumpsteer will likely be a problem unless it's adjusted out anyway.
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 07:00 PM
  #15  
Aussie66Fastback's Avatar
Aussie66Fastback
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,266
From: Australia
Default

also depends how much front suspension travel you have. a lot of guys with lowered 620's and beefy shocks arent going to notice bump steer. they may get "manhole cover" steer, "railroad track" steer or numerous other steering reactions from drving over non-conforming road surfaces due to suspension being too stiff Most of the time it gets incorrectly labelled as bump steer.
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 07:46 PM
  #16  
nba1341's Avatar
nba1341
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,246
From: Upland, California
Default

I had bump steer for years... Until I changed my tires
Old Jun 23, 2010 | 06:03 AM
  #17  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,635
From: state of confusion
Default

Originally Posted by nba1341
I had bump steer for years... Until I changed my tires
Which means that what you were really experiencing before changing the tires was tramlining. Which is generally more annoying than bumpsteer anyway.

Following every little wiggle in the truck tire ruts isn't the same thing as having to saw back and forth on the steering wheel in order to stay on your line through a turn.


Norm
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cr620
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
2
Oct 3, 2022 10:18 PM
Thunderball
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
15
Nov 22, 2015 11:49 PM
UrS4
S197 Handling Section
1
Sep 30, 2015 10:13 AM
marc954
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
2
Sep 29, 2015 11:18 AM
lincolnshibuya
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
1
Sep 24, 2015 10:46 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:34 PM.