Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

1965 fast back with major rust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-03-2010, 07:09 AM
  #31  
NoReins
3rd Gear Member
 
NoReins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 756
Default

If you have them, they will be under the toeboards. Your car did not come with front torque boxes from the factory. They could have been added at some point but yes, I would add them if they are not there. Torque boxes add quite a bit of rigidity to the unibody.

Here's a good how to:

http://www.mustangmonthly.com/projec...box/index.html

As far as the subframe connectors, I would recommend them, too. Especially since you are going to be replacing the floors, subframe connectors will keep the body in line and will help prevent any twisting or movement. But, if you want to restore to original, don't add either!
NoReins is offline  
Old 10-03-2010, 12:09 PM
  #32  
69FB
4th Gear Member
 
69FB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 1,424
Default

NoReigns is correct if you are restoring to original do not add either. If you are looking to restomod, pro-touring or just make a fun driver I would definitely add them. The unibody construction (no frame) makes the car less rigid. If you want it to handle well a stiffer body will help. Having said that I would suggest the Tinman for subframe connectors. Everything I have read gives them good reviews.

For my sheetmetal I used all Dynacorn pieces. Granted I am limited compared to the 65-68 crowd as far as the parts since I have a 69. I will say the doors have an added crash/safety bar inside the doors I bought that I really like. I don't want to think about someone hitting the car but if they do I like the extra safety over the original ones.
69FB is offline  
Old 10-04-2010, 12:57 PM
  #33  
OCHOHILL
2nd Gear Member
 
OCHOHILL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: az
Posts: 459
Default

Something I thought I should mention about the door fitment:

-the factory fitment on these cars wasn't the best
-my factory doors and quarter panels didn't meet well, mostly in and out problems
-I had to drill out the quarter panel welds at the door pillar and move the quarter panel in and out to get the best fitment with the door

Good luck.
OCHOHILL is offline  
Old 10-06-2010, 09:54 PM
  #34  
bent metal
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
bent metal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: ca
Posts: 197
Default

Ok, it looks like I'm going to have some issues with fit. Right now the driver's side door is about a quarter of an inch too high, at the top. About an eighth of an inch too low in the middle, and just about right at the bottom! haha

I do have a question, on the front fenders, at the very bottom, behind the wheel well (like where you would have a mud flap). Both sides are pointing out and it doesn't look like there is a mount of any kind there? I didn't take the car apart so I don't know. I would expect to see a bracket to adjust and secure the fender there??
bent metal is offline  
Old 10-07-2010, 11:33 AM
  #35  
bent metal
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
bent metal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: ca
Posts: 197
Default

Door alignment picture.https://mustangforums.com/forum/memb...alignment.html
bent metal is offline  
Old 10-07-2010, 11:38 AM
  #36  
2+2GT
6th Gear Member
 
2+2GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 5,232
Default

Originally Posted by bent metal
Ok, it looks like I'm going to have some issues with fit. Right now the driver's side door is about a quarter of an inch too high, at the top. About an eighth of an inch too low in the middle, and just about right at the bottom! haha

I do have a question, on the front fenders, at the very bottom, behind the wheel well (like where you would have a mud flap). Both sides are pointing out and it doesn't look like there is a mount of any kind there? I didn't take the car apart so I don't know. I would expect to see a bracket to adjust and secure the fender there??
On a 67-68, yes.

Align the door to the quarter. Then align the fender to the door.
2+2GT is offline  
Old 10-07-2010, 12:30 PM
  #37  
mr_velocity
4th Gear Member
 
mr_velocity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,027
Default

Even with "what is supposed to be the best" golden legion doors I had to cut, weld and fill the doors to make they fit. The right door fit different than the left door too. Get the alignment to the rear quarter AND the rocker. I say both because my pass door fit perfect to the qtr but the seam was 1/2" off from front to rear along the rocker. I found I had to weld additional metal to the rear of the door to close up the seam. Then hood (get the seam perfect along the cowl) then fenders, then front end then see how to get the fender to align to the door.
Although I'm not through this entire process yet, its what the guys in the shop at the Mustang Barn told me to do.
mr_velocity is offline  
Old 10-07-2010, 07:04 PM
  #38  
bent metal
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
bent metal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: ca
Posts: 197
Default

Very much appreciate all the advise. I'm following it all as well. The car looks to have been T-boned at one time, on the driver's side. I think that's why the body lines are so bad there. The new panels look pretty good so far. Since I'm installing new quarters as well, the poor fit on the driver's side should be ok when all of it is new.

Tomorrow I start cutting.

So there is no support bracket on the front fender. Only on 67-68's. Well, I'd like to add one if they don't look too obvious. Anyone have a picture? Or do I just wing it?

One more thing, all over the place on this car there are little blobs of braze on the joints. Is that normal?
bent metal is offline  
Old 10-10-2010, 02:58 PM
  #39  
cprstreetmachines
4th Gear Member
 
cprstreetmachines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 1,235
Default

Originally Posted by 2+2GT
You using an iPhone? That car is 6" long on my laptop. OK, this close enough for you?
I was poking fun at the distance you were from the car. Can't judge a gaps worth from 60 ft away, or at an angle. Lol, don't get butt hurt jeez.
cprstreetmachines is offline  
Old 10-25-2010, 03:21 PM
  #40  
bent metal
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
bent metal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: ca
Posts: 197
Default

This project is a bit overwhelming. Seems like I'm replacing more than I'm keeping. Also, removing spot welds turned out to be not as much fun as I thought it would be.
I still haven't posted enough here to be allowed to insert pictures. But here's a link to the photo album that's on this site.
https://mustangforums.com/forum/memb...993-small.html
bent metal is offline  


Quick Reply: 1965 fast back with major rust



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:51 PM.