Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

'66 GT is it worth it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 12, 2011 | 03:13 PM
  #31  
2+2GT's Avatar
2+2GT
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,232
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by Rat fink
2+2 has got to be a Democrat, a stupid Dem.
Now you've gone too far. You can call me fat, lazy, stupid, late for dinner, odious, or even a Chevy-lover, but if you call me that again, I'm going to demand pistols at 20 paces.

Old May 12, 2011 | 03:19 PM
  #32  
2+2GT's Avatar
2+2GT
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,232
From: PA
Default

HO does mean High output, HP does not mean High performance to everyone in the world but 2+2.

Every one in the world knows that HP means Horse power except for 2+2.
Really?
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&s...g-j1&aql=t&oq=

I could go on but .
You really should put an ellipsis after the "but", not a period. Here's one you can use…

2+2 has got to be a Democrate, a stupid Dem.
I think you mean Democrat. A Democrate would be some sort of box.

Last edited by 2+2GT; May 12, 2011 at 03:23 PM.
Old May 12, 2011 | 03:26 PM
  #33  
1971mach1's Avatar
1971mach1
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 469
From: The garage (near SF bay- Calif)
Default

Originally Posted by rtintwo
Please dont missquote me. I said the only way the car is worth that much is if it has won in concours class. Change anything (like the cut to the floor to fit the T-5 shifter) and its not worth what a body put into it and that would be money that could have been more wisely spent. I am not a purist when it comes to mustangs but i do have sense enough to know what is wisely spent money.

I see no misquote in my book. (but maybe I'm reading from a book that shows the bigger picture).
Calling someone "a fool of the highest order" would be reserved to someone who put all their life savings in Bernie Maidoff's ponzie scheme, or someone who invested everything in Enron stock before the collapse,
not someone who paid a few thousand extra to have a nice car, modified the way they want it. There are millions of people who have spent way more on their car than it's worth now, so what's the difference? You could be calling almost everyone who bought a new car a fool. In reality, most folks
who buy new cars can afford the extra expense to have a nice car that they don't have to spend alot of time fixing. Their time is worth more than the extra money they spent.

Last edited by 1971mach1; May 12, 2011 at 03:47 PM.
Old May 12, 2011 | 03:38 PM
  #34  
2+2GT's Avatar
2+2GT
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,232
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by 1971mach1
…not someone who paid a few thousand extra to have a nice car, modified the way they want it. There are millions of people who have spent way more on their car than it's worth now, so what's the difference? You'd be could be calling almost everyone who bought a new car a fool.
I agree. I know of a car restored to BOSS 302 specs, right down to "correct" bolts on the BOSS engine, started life as an F code sportsroof. Guy altered it to look like a mach1 when in college, drove it until it was a rusty hulk, all the while dreamed it was a BOSS. Years later, dragged it out of the back yard and had it done. Could have had a real BOSS for less, but it wouldn't have been that car. He wasn't doing it for the money. I could name at least six other such examples.

Old May 12, 2011 | 03:51 PM
  #35  
nassaubayman's Avatar
nassaubayman
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 574
From: Houston, TX
Default

Rat fink - 2011 Ford Mustang
2+2GT - 66 Mustang 2+2GT

Who would you really go to as a source for 1st generation Mustang info? It's obvious Rat fink is in the wrong section of this forum.

Go back and take a look at post #22. Those pictures tell you exactly what 289 HP mean. 289 HP definitely didn't mean 289 horsepower, as no such motor was produced.
Old May 12, 2011 | 03:54 PM
  #36  
dodgestang's Avatar
dodgestang
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,176
From: Insanity
Default

Where the heck is this abortion going?
Old May 12, 2011 | 04:03 PM
  #37  
Rat fink's Avatar
Rat fink
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 254
From: texas
Default

All right, I apologize to everyone, about everything, I was wrong and everyone is correct.
Old May 12, 2011 | 04:20 PM
  #38  
67t5ponycoupe's Avatar
67t5ponycoupe
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,946
From: Colorado
Default

What i got from this post is that 2+2 is not a dem which I'm very happy to learn. The HP thing always confused me so I'm glad to get that straight. I do know what an FNG is as most military guys do so you might want to tread a little easier there Rat Fink, FNG.
Old May 12, 2011 | 04:22 PM
  #39  
dodgestang's Avatar
dodgestang
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,176
From: Insanity
Default

Originally Posted by Rat fink
All right, I apologize to everyone, about everything, I was wrong and everyone is correct.
I don't think sarcasm is what is needed.

I disagree with 2+2 all the time. I don't think I've ever needed to call him names though and we manage to get along somewhat civilly

What's important is that if you make a point and it is challenged defend it with facts and not emotion so everyone can understand how an opinion was formed and then everyone learns a new way to look at something.

For the record I read 289 HP and see 289 Horse Power because of all the chevy guys where the chevy motor cubic inches has magically become the HP they all had (like the might 350 horse mouse block )

I've only ever referred to the 289 as a 289...or as a 289 HiPo.
Old May 12, 2011 | 04:29 PM
  #40  
2+2GT's Avatar
2+2GT
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,232
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by dodgestang
Where the heck is this abortion going?
Dunno, but it's been fun. The O.P.'s question was long answered, I think, it's a matter of whether you like coupes (I do, despite owning a FB) and how well it is restored.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 AM.