Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

new 289

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2006 | 01:06 AM
  #11  
6mustang6's Avatar
6mustang6
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,645
From:
Default RE: new 289

Shorter strokes are better right?
Old Jan 30, 2006 | 03:20 AM
  #12  
Shifty101Easy's Avatar
Shifty101Easy
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,707
From: San Francisco
Default RE: new 289

shorter piston rods increase displacement. i think stroker kits come with a differnt crank shaft that pushes the piston farther up the cylander, but since it has a shorter rod, it gets pulled out more on each stroke thus increasing the displacement.....

i could be wrong...but someone can correct or confirm...
Old Jan 30, 2006 | 03:24 AM
  #13  
67t5ponycoupe's Avatar
67t5ponycoupe
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,946
From: Colorado
Default RE: new 289

I never quite understood why there is always so much confusion over short block, long block, small block, big block. Hey it sounds like Dr. Sues! Short block ain't got no heads, long block does. It ain't got diddly dink to do with the size of the block or the displacement.
Old Jan 30, 2006 | 06:08 AM
  #14  
Shifty101Easy's Avatar
Shifty101Easy
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,707
From: San Francisco
Default RE: new 289

yeah.

short block = less stuff already on it.....usually crank, pistons, timing chain.....

long stuff = pretty much everything except like the manifold, carb, airfilter and distributor and stuff....

big block = big displacement engine

small block = small displacement engine

this is all generally speaking
Old Jan 30, 2006 | 08:06 AM
  #15  
THUMPIN455's Avatar
THUMPIN455
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,566
From: Marquette Mi
Default RE: new 289

The only things that change displacement is bore and stroke. Adding a longer rod will just move the piston in a different place in the cylinder. To keep the same compression ratio, the pin boss (where the rod attaches to the piston) must be moved closer to the crown, or top of piston.

Short strokes are good for high rpm. It has to do with how fast the piston is moving, and how fast it has to change directions, and how far it has to move. Moving something one inch is easier tham moving it 4 inches, there is less stress on the parts and less friction. The draw back is torque is reduced so more rpm must be used to make up for the short stroke.

Some engines are designed with a very short stroke so they can operate at a very high rpm. Usually that is the case because they are class limited in displacement. So how do you get 1400 hp out of 2 liters? Make it a V12 with a very short stroke, short deck, and oversquare bore. That means the bore is bigger than the stroke. Then add a couple turbos and you have a Formula 1 engine. They have alot of gears because the rpm range is so high and so narrow they need to make up for it with gears. They dont even start making power untill around 8000 rpm.

Long strokes make more torque and under 5250 rpm, torque is what matters. Especially for a street engine. They have greater leverage from a longer lever, like the difference between a 1/4" drive ratchet and a 1/2" drive ratchet. The 1/2" drive is longer so you can apply more torque. Take the 400M, it has a 4" bore and a 4" stroke. The 351M has a 4" bore and a 3.5" stroke. The 400 will make more torque at a lower rpm than the 351 everything else being the same. It has an additional .5" of leverage from the pistons, turning the crank. Up to a certain point, a longer stroke is good for a drag engine, unless limited by class rules.

Have you seen how well a 347 runs compared to a 302? The difference is a 3" stroke to a 3.5" stroke, which has more effect than the .030 or .060 increase in bore.
Old Jan 30, 2006 | 11:29 AM
  #16  
traveler's Avatar
traveler
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 528
From:
Default RE: new 289

Why are you sending this reply to me? I know the differences...thanks...Volcom66 was looking for a 289 but also appreciate the refresher.
Old Jan 30, 2006 | 11:42 AM
  #17  
CRIMPS66's Avatar
CRIMPS66
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 14
From:
Default RE: new 289

I love the explanation thumpin. Thanks
Old Jan 30, 2006 | 04:48 PM
  #18  
slickman's Avatar
slickman
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,634
From: SC
Default RE: new 289

Great post!! [sm=interesting.gif] [sm=groupwave.gif]

ORIGINAL: THUMPIN455

The only things that change displacement is bore and stroke. Adding a longer rod will just move the piston in a different place in the cylinder. To keep the same compression ratio, the pin boss (where the rod attaches to the piston) must be moved closer to the crown, or top of piston.

Short strokes are good for high rpm. It has to do with how fast the piston is moving, and how fast it has to change directions, and how far it has to move. Moving something one inch is easier tham moving it 4 inches, there is less stress on the parts and less friction. The draw back is torque is reduced so more rpm must be used to make up for the short stroke.

Some engines are designed with a very short stroke so they can operate at a very high rpm. Usually that is the case because they are class limited in displacement. So how do you get 1400 hp out of 2 liters? Make it a V12 with a very short stroke, short deck, and oversquare bore. That means the bore is bigger than the stroke. Then add a couple turbos and you have a Formula 1 engine. They have alot of gears because the rpm range is so high and so narrow they need to make up for it with gears. They dont even start making power untill around 8000 rpm.

Long strokes make more torque and under 5250 rpm, torque is what matters. Especially for a street engine. They have greater leverage from a longer lever, like the difference between a 1/4" drive ratchet and a 1/2" drive ratchet. The 1/2" drive is longer so you can apply more torque. Take the 400M, it has a 4" bore and a 4" stroke. The 351M has a 4" bore and a 3.5" stroke. The 400 will make more torque at a lower rpm than the 351 everything else being the same. It has an additional .5" of leverage from the pistons, turning the crank. Up to a certain point, a longer stroke is good for a drag engine, unless limited by class rules.

Have you seen how well a 347 runs compared to a 302? The difference is a 3" stroke to a 3.5" stroke, which has more effect than the .030 or .060 increase in bore.
Old Jan 30, 2006 | 05:34 PM
  #19  
Soaring's Avatar
Soaring
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,565
From:
Default RE: new 289

Ain't nobody STOOPID on here. I just replaced the 6Volt 36 amp batteries in my golf cart today and went 18 holes. Shot an 82. Back was hurting me though. But, the dog enjoyed the ride.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
uberstang1
4.6L General Discussion
67
Dec 7, 2017 07:10 AM
GTJIM
New Member Area
7
Sep 23, 2015 09:59 AM
ryland
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
0
Sep 13, 2015 12:35 PM
Brian Emmer
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
11
Sep 9, 2015 02:50 PM
ding56
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
3
Aug 14, 2015 02:40 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47 AM.