Mustang dyno vs. Dynojet
#11
RE: Mustang dyno vs. Dynojet
ORIGINAL: JD1969
Weight really has no affect on how much HP a car puts down. The reason the two dynos will show different numbers is because of how they are loaded. Check out the web sites for a better explination, I am too lazy to type it all out, but basicly Mustang Dynos are better for tuning a car as they simulate the real world better, if all you care about is braging about numbers go to a Dynojet.
Weight really has no affect on how much HP a car puts down. The reason the two dynos will show different numbers is because of how they are loaded. Check out the web sites for a better explination, I am too lazy to type it all out, but basicly Mustang Dynos are better for tuning a car as they simulate the real world better, if all you care about is braging about numbers go to a Dynojet.
#12
RE: Mustang dyno vs. Dynojet
I recently had my 96 cobra dyno'd on a Mustang Dyno and was wondering if you know what is means by "with WCF" on the dyno sheet?
I have a Maximum HP and Torque and for each of these there is also a line underneath that says "with WCF" and the numbers are lower.
Exaple:
Maximum Torque 289
with WCF 280
I figure WCF is factoring of something, but what? Is the upper number with no factoring or do both numbers have factoring and WCF has additional factoring?
Thanks
I have a Maximum HP and Torque and for each of these there is also a line underneath that says "with WCF" and the numbers are lower.
Exaple:
Maximum Torque 289
with WCF 280
I figure WCF is factoring of something, but what? Is the upper number with no factoring or do both numbers have factoring and WCF has additional factoring?
Thanks
#14
RE: Mustang dyno vs. Dynojet
OK, cool.
With the weight and other factors that the Mustang Dyno also accounts for, are these accounted for in the non-WCF value?
And when compared to DynoJet numbers, even the non-WCF numbers are typically less than DynoJet numbers?
Thanks again for the help.
With the weight and other factors that the Mustang Dyno also accounts for, are these accounted for in the non-WCF value?
And when compared to DynoJet numbers, even the non-WCF numbers are typically less than DynoJet numbers?
Thanks again for the help.
#16
RE: Mustang dyno vs. Dynojet
About 8-10%. I also just want to say that dynos are nothing more than a tool to be used for tuning purposes, the numbers can be manipulated and weather is a big factor. Dyno two stock cars, one in Maine and then one in Florida at the same time of year and the results will be different. One thing to consider on a Mustang Dyno is that the uncorrected numbers are what the car would make in "perfect weather", corrected is what the car actually made.
#17
RE: Mustang dyno vs. Dynojet
ORIGINAL: JD1969
About 8-10%. I also just want to say that dynos are nothing more than a tool to be used for tuning purposes, the numbers can be manipulated and weather is a big factor. Dyno two stock cars, one in Maine and then one in Florida at the same time of year and the results will be different. One thing to consider on a Mustang Dyno is that the uncorrected numbers are what the car would make in "perfect weather", corrected is what the car actually made.
About 8-10%. I also just want to say that dynos are nothing more than a tool to be used for tuning purposes, the numbers can be manipulated and weather is a big factor. Dyno two stock cars, one in Maine and then one in Florida at the same time of year and the results will be different. One thing to consider on a Mustang Dyno is that the uncorrected numbers are what the car would make in "perfect weather", corrected is what the car actually made.
BTW, I didn't do a dynopull for tuning.......just to check A/F and get an idea of how much hp I was putting out after the s/c install. Dunno if that makes me some sort of "dyno-queen" for wanting some numbers to put with my overall performance....but I wanted to know.
#18
RE: Mustang dyno vs. Dynojet
I never said you are a dyno queen man. The Mustang Dyno will show about 8-10% less hp than a Dynojet. Also keep in mind that a lower (ie 4.10) gear will also cause the dyno to show a lower hp number.
#19
RE: Mustang dyno vs. Dynojet
ORIGINAL: JD1969
I never said you are a dyno queen man. The Mustang Dyno will show about 8-10% less hp than a Dynojet. Also keep in mind that a lower (ie 4.10) gear will also cause the dyno to show a lower hp number.
I never said you are a dyno queen man. The Mustang Dyno will show about 8-10% less hp than a Dynojet. Also keep in mind that a lower (ie 4.10) gear will also cause the dyno to show a lower hp number.
#20
RE: Mustang dyno vs. Dynojet
ORIGINAL: JD1969
One thing to consider on a Mustang Dyno is that the uncorrected numbers are what the car would make in "perfect weather", corrected is what the car actually made.
One thing to consider on a Mustang Dyno is that the uncorrected numbers are what the car would make in "perfect weather", corrected is what the car actually made.
ORIGINAL: JD1969
Also keep in mind that a lower (ie 4.10) gear will also cause the dyno to show a lower hp number.
Also keep in mind that a lower (ie 4.10) gear will also cause the dyno to show a lower hp number.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Diode Dynamics
Vendor For Sale / Group Buy Classifieds
28
05-26-2022 12:02 PM
2004, 250, 351, 40, ci, craigslist, difference, dyno, dynojet, horsepower, installation, mustang, stock, test, v6