Not if i swap my ported M112 back on for the weekend! If I just write SVT on the front next to the snout, how many people would realized I switched from a black M112 to a Whipple anyway??

 

lol im sure none of us would notice

 

sorry, cant help it

"Lurking below the 301-inch modular in an HP Performance twin turbo kit with 57mm turbos. Shoving 15 pounds of boost into the Bullitt intake manifold and Patriot Performance heads generates 602 rwhp and 615 rwtq"

http://www.turbochargedpower.com/Carter%2001%20GT.htm

"Congradulations to J's new dyno numbers making 610rwhp and 570rwtq at 5800 rpms 16 psi. J is currently running the version 2 twin turbo kit layout. Running twin gt30r .81 turbine a/r ball bearing turbos. Dual 3" exhaust dump pipes and 3.5" intercooler pipes. Here is a link to his dyno vids. Right click save as "

http://tmaturbo.com/

 

Yep, to add to that, Gary made 660rwhp on only 15 psi with his V6 as well. Just goes to show the v6 can really flow when built right. But then what do we know.... we own the wrong motor right?

 

Theres a reason my sixxer is project "You're doing it wrong"

 

^^^ I like the name. I think it is perfect

 

i usually look at mine and say "but its still a six"

 

I know what your saying, and thats a hot v-6... however you have to acknowledge that a v8 with the same build (which is just about the same cost) would be making substantially more power, apples to apples

 

ummmm, only differance was the v6 was on stock ported heads

 

Not a chance that the V8 at that power level is the same cost. Six of everything instead of 8 in the bottom end... and the V8 would also require aftermarket crank and block - which a V6 uses the stock Ford parts for. And look at the numbers. The V6 cars where using similar PSI levels and making the same (if not more) power. Numbers don't lie (in this case).