My 1/4mile dissapointment!
6th Gear Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,865
From: Ludlow, Mass
RE: My 1/4mile dissapointment!
ORIGINAL: 06musgt
they can be inaccurate,back when i had a 02 v6 mustang,me,my brother and our friend went out and ran our cars.my 02 v6,i ran 16.7,not bad for a v6,then my brother in his 98 gt,16.1,not good,then our friends in his 89 5.0 lx,he ran a 16.4,something had to be wrong.i knew that me and the 89 would be close but the 98 gt should have down alot better.i don't always trust those g-techs.
they can be inaccurate,back when i had a 02 v6 mustang,me,my brother and our friend went out and ran our cars.my 02 v6,i ran 16.7,not bad for a v6,then my brother in his 98 gt,16.1,not good,then our friends in his 89 5.0 lx,he ran a 16.4,something had to be wrong.i knew that me and the 89 would be close but the 98 gt should have down alot better.i don't always trust those g-techs.
take it to a real track i dont trust them anyways, i got a 15.9 off my 02 vert even tho that seems acurate[8D]
5th Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,206
From: Tampico, Mexico
RE: My 1/4mile dissapointment!
ORIGINAL: AmericanMuscle4.6GT
i would say with 100% confidence that the G-tech is at fault.
i would say with 100% confidence that the G-tech is at fault.
3rd Gear Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 585
From:
RE: My 1/4mile dissapointment!
ORIGINAL: Mellowdien
Yes 245/35ZR20
Yes 245/35ZR20
ORIGINAL: Lees07GT
Okay, the width is 245. What is the profile? As in 245/35?
Okay, the width is 245. What is the profile? As in 245/35?
Ok here is how you get it:
width*profile*2 / 2540 + wheel size = tire diameter
235*50*2 / 2540 + 18 = 27.2
245*35*2 / 2540 + 20 = 26.75
It's about the same so no worries. If your tire width is 265 you'll be right at 27.3
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 328
From:
RE: My 1/4mile dissapointment!
i know the gt should have been easily in the 15's.thats why i never bought one,the one we used was my fathers.then again,maybe it just needed to be calibrated.
ORIGINAL: mustangman02232
no all those are slow
take it to a real track i dont trust them anyways, i got a 15.9 off my 02 vert even tho that seems acurate[8D]
ORIGINAL: 06musgt
they can be inaccurate,back when i had a 02 v6 mustang,me,my brother and our friend went out and ran our cars.my 02 v6,i ran 16.7,not bad for a v6,then my brother in his 98 gt,16.1,not good,then our friends in his 89 5.0 lx,he ran a 16.4,something had to be wrong.i knew that me and the 89 would be close but the 98 gt should have down alot better.i don't always trust those g-techs.
they can be inaccurate,back when i had a 02 v6 mustang,me,my brother and our friend went out and ran our cars.my 02 v6,i ran 16.7,not bad for a v6,then my brother in his 98 gt,16.1,not good,then our friends in his 89 5.0 lx,he ran a 16.4,something had to be wrong.i knew that me and the 89 would be close but the 98 gt should have down alot better.i don't always trust those g-techs.
take it to a real track i dont trust them anyways, i got a 15.9 off my 02 vert even tho that seems acurate[8D]
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
spederman
Saleen, Roush and Boss Mustangs
1
May 2, 2005 01:03 AM
