GT S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V8 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

Question Regarding Fuel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 04:26 PM
  #1  
cadillo's Avatar
cadillo
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 44
From: Texas
Default Question Regarding Fuel

I've got a new '08 GT with manual trans. The manual says that the engine is designed to run on 87 octane fuel. My question is whether the use of either 89 or 93 octane fuel will cause any problems with regard to the computer programming. Will the computer adjust the ignition lead and or advance to take advantageof the slower burn rates of higher octane fuels, or will the computer not react at all to the change?
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 05:27 PM
  #2  
Diabolical!'s Avatar
Diabolical!
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,491
From: New Orleans
Default RE: Question Regarding Fuel

Only the special edition bullitt is capable of adjusting to different octanes. Your best bet is to buy a tune for the octane you wish to run, or just stick to 87.
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 04:59 AM
  #3  
mygt500's Avatar
mygt500
Multi-Tasking Moderator!
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,618
From: Detroit Rock City!
Default RE: Question Regarding Fuel

Get a CAI and tune and stick to 87 octane otherwise. It wont hurt the car but it is a waste of mod money and gas... J
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 06:45 AM
  #4  
Nuke's Avatar
Nuke
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 16,182
From: PA to KY ('07) to IL ('09) to MS ('10) to FL ('11)
Default RE: Question Regarding Fuel

The stock tune is designed for 87 octane. Anything higher is a waste of $$. Plus, there's been some debate regarding detrimental effects of running higher octane on the stock tune. Use the search feature as this has been discussed over and over and over.
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 09:37 AM
  #5  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,635
From: state of confusion
Default RE: Question Regarding Fuel

The only reason that I can think of for running 91 or 93 octane in an unmodified engine is if you're getting ready to install a tune for the higher octane and don't want to be caught with any 87 in the tank. 89 octane isn't going to cut it for any of the premium-fuel tunes, and probably won't help a bone-stock engine much either.


Norm
(using 91 octane in preparation for upcoming CAK/tune)
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 10:11 AM
  #6  
GidyupGo's Avatar
GidyupGo
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,547
From: The High Country
Default RE: Question Regarding Fuel

I run a tank of 91 (Highest here in my town) from Shell every other month or so the get the benifits of the higher detergent.
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 07:51 PM
  #7  
algregory's Avatar
algregory
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 701
From: New Bern, NC
Default RE: Question Regarding Fuel

ORIGINAL: GidyupGo

I run a tank of 91 (Highest here in my town) from Shell every other month or so the get the benefits of the higher detergent.
I lived in California till a year ago. All my "rides" use regular, using premium is a waste of money. I was a rabid believer in Red Line Oil products, every time I filled up my modified BMW for twenty years I'd put a smidgen of Red Line Fuel treatment in the tank. After 29 years and 269k miles I was still blessed with three out of four original injectors, and my fuel lines clear and see through from the factory were still clear and see through.

That being said, Red Line is not common at all in North Carolina, now using about 6 ounces of Lucas Oil fuel treatment in a tank starting only recently. I'm here to tell you stuff is GREAT! Throttle response is much improved, and hard acceleration has improved also, tires attempting to break traction through 2nd gear, with traction control on, and I'm not one of the "burn out" fans, just hard acceleration is breaking them lose.

Old Mar 19, 2008 | 08:10 PM
  #8  
GidyupGo's Avatar
GidyupGo
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,547
From: The High Country
Default RE: Question Regarding Fuel

ORIGINAL: algregory

ORIGINAL: GidyupGo

I run a tank of 91 (Highest here in my town) from Shell every other month or so the get the benefits of the higher detergent.
I lived in California till a year ago. All my "rides" use regular, using premium is a waste of money. I was a rabid believer in Red Line Oil products, every time I filled up my modified BMW for twenty years I'd put a smidgen of Red Line Fuel treatment in the tank. After 29 years and 269k miles I was still blessed with three out of four original injectors, and my fuel lines clear and see through from the factory were still clear and see through.

That being said, Red Line is not common at all in North Carolina, now using about 6 ounces of Lucas Oil fuel treatment in a tank starting only recently. I'm here to tell you stuff is GREAT! Throttle response is much improved, and hard acceleration has improved also, tires attempting to break traction through 2nd gear, with traction control on, and I'm not one of the "burn out" fans, just hard acceleration is breaking them lose.







Shell's premo gas has 5 times the cleaning agents as what the feds mandate. It'll keep things clean, and will clean up junk already there. Or so they say.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
04stangman
2005-2014 Mustangs
4
Sep 17, 2015 01:45 PM
raleigh05GTO
New Member Area
5
Sep 4, 2015 07:09 AM
5.0 kevo
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
6
Sep 3, 2015 06:24 PM
SYNY5TER
Archive - Parts For Sale
0
Sep 2, 2015 01:35 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57 AM.