Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion Did you see that Mustang?! Have you heard Ford's next move? Come inside.

Horsepower History: Mustang Power Numbers Through the Years

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 14, 2015 | 01:23 PM
  #1  
MustangForums Editor's Avatar
MustangForums Editor
Thread Starter
MustangForums Editor
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,309
Default Horsepower History: Mustang Power Numbers Through the Years



There's much to learn about the Mustang from taking a peak at the pony car's history of horsepower.

Read the rest on the Mustang Forums homepage. >>
Old Aug 14, 2015 | 02:18 PM
  #2  
Rocket Ray's Avatar
Rocket Ray
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 231
From: NY
Default

Isn't there a difference in how they measure hp now as opposed to the 60's? Now they have to be rated at the flywheel with all accessories and manifolds in place, whereas I believe formerly they could take all that stuff off and measure the hp on a test stand.

Last edited by Rocket Ray; Aug 14, 2015 at 02:18 PM. Reason: sp
Old Aug 14, 2015 | 02:28 PM
  #3  
67LimeCoupe's Avatar
67LimeCoupe
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 96
From: MN
Default

pretty sure the I6 and smaller v8s in the 60s werent making 250 hp.

170ci - 101hp
200ci - 120
250ci - 155 in '69 and rerated at 88 in '72 (lol)
289ci - 200hp (225 in HiPo)
302ci - 220hp (250 with 4 barrel)

Its a cool infograph but not accurate.
Old Aug 14, 2015 | 06:28 PM
  #4  
Choppertwo's Avatar
Choppertwo
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 625
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by 67LimeCoupe
pretty sure the I6 and smaller v8s in the 60s werent making 250 hp.

170ci - 101hp
200ci - 120
250ci - 155 in '69 and rerated at 88 in '72 (lol)
289ci - 200hp (225 in HiPo)
302ci - 220hp (250 with 4 barrel)

Its a cool infograph but not accurate.
I don;t nowabout the rest of them but I'm pretty sure the 289 cobra ran 271 hp
Old Aug 14, 2015 | 08:59 PM
  #5  
MtnMustang's Avatar
MtnMustang
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 53
From: CO
Default

A lot of people mistake the 225 HP A code 289 as the Hipo. The 225 hp was the standard GT engine with 4bbl but not the HiPo
The HiPo was the K code and was 271 hp in the Mustang with apx 306 hp in the Shelby Cobra and GT 350 and a bit more in the R models. These are actually pretty rare considering how many mustangs were made in 65, 66 and 67, but very few K codes. Plenty of A Code 225 hp and C Code 210 hp 289s.
Old Aug 17, 2015 | 11:06 PM
  #6  
raven_ghostwolf's Avatar
raven_ghostwolf
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 938
From: Eloy, AZ
Default

Starting in 1972, h.p. ratings where S.A.E. net, measured at the rear of the transmission, with all accessories installed and operating.

The original engine in my old 73 Mach 1 was a "M" code 351 Windsor rated at only 164 h.p, for comparison the same 351 Windsor in 1971 was rated @ 240 h.p.

Last edited by raven_ghostwolf; Aug 17, 2015 at 11:09 PM.
Old Aug 18, 2015 | 08:41 AM
  #7  
dragman72's Avatar
dragman72
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 154
From: PA
Default

Yes this graph should transpose them all into SAE Net or Gross HP ratings. The new 2015 mustang would be easily over 500HP if they used Gross HP ratings.
Old Aug 26, 2015 | 01:33 AM
  #8  
MiamiMustang's Avatar
MiamiMustang
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 35
From: Florida
Default

Interesting. I'd also be interested in the Mile Per Gallon throughout the years, to see how that's ebbed and flowed.
Old Jan 6, 2016 | 07:03 PM
  #9  
Choppertwo's Avatar
Choppertwo
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 625
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by MtnMustang
A lot of people mistake the 225 HP A code 289 as the Hipo. The 225 hp was the standard GT engine with 4bbl but not the HiPo
The HiPo was the K code and was 271 hp in the Mustang with apx 306 hp in the Shelby Cobra and GT 350 and a bit more in the R models. These are actually pretty rare considering how many mustangs were made in 65, 66 and 67, but very few K codes. Plenty of A Code 225 hp and C Code 210 hp 289s.
I know old thread, but I just have to chime in, I have a 14 3.7 with tune and catback , BUT remembering my friend back in 1970(i know along time ago)Who had a 289 cobra 67, fairlane , I know you didnt think they put Cobras in lesser models , but they did, but it was a plain jane and it was soo fast . Anyway those engines were so torqued out, even tho I'm running 30 more HP in mine, I just couldnt see me beating him in the quarter
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Diode Dynamics
Vendor For Sale / Group Buy Classifieds
28
May 26, 2022 12:02 PM
Urambo Tauro
New Member Area
12
Dec 17, 2016 03:30 PM
daytooday
Motor Swap Section
2
Aug 11, 2015 09:22 AM
MustangForums Editor
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
0
Aug 10, 2015 02:02 PM
mustangfan305
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
3
Aug 7, 2015 11:09 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:09 PM.