J&M extreme joint LCA's?
#11
http://www.hotpart.com/shop/index.ph...ct_detail&p=46
I ordered them, so I'll take some pics. If I break them, I'll be sure to post about it.
#12
http://www.lmperformance.com/53001/73.html
Anyone using these? I'm wondering if it's a better option than a spherical bearing. By better, I mean less NVH, but still prevent binding.
Anyone using these? I'm wondering if it's a better option than a spherical bearing. By better, I mean less NVH, but still prevent binding.
#14
I'm no engineer, but why doesn't someone make a poly/poly lca that swivels at the bar or right in front of the mounting point? That way you could have good articulation like with a spherical bushing, but there's be less NVH. Maybe having the bar swivel would be to weak or expensive.
Either way, you'd have to provide clearance to permit not only the swiveling but also to fix the position of the rod/piston inside the outer tube. That ultimately suggests long-term looseness and rattling. There's likely a fix for that as well, as long as adding complexity and possible maintenance is not a deal-breaker.
Norm
#15
Norm, I think the need isn't really there or in other words, what's available is good enough. Anyway the J&M lca's are basically the same thing only the swivel is the mounting point.
I didn't take any pics, but these things feel really nice in the hand. The extreme joint comes all ready assembled and it's very tight. These things feel lighter than my CHE's, but they are larger diameter tubing.
I don't see these breaking like the CHE's did. I would stay clear of the CHE adj LCA's unless they have changed their design. Pics of the J&M tomorrow.
I didn't take any pics, but these things feel really nice in the hand. The extreme joint comes all ready assembled and it's very tight. These things feel lighter than my CHE's, but they are larger diameter tubing.
I don't see these breaking like the CHE's did. I would stay clear of the CHE adj LCA's unless they have changed their design. Pics of the J&M tomorrow.
#16
These things ride very nice! There is no increase in NVH and there might actually be a decrease over the stock arms. They really make the rear feel solid and of course wheel hop is gone once again.
I'm sold.
Sorry, no pics off the car.
#17
The scariest thing about your "retired auto parts" picture is that if you'd let it go long enough the force that would have opened up the whole business would have happened under hard braking.
I'll just mention that I wouldn't design a control arm quite like the ones that belong in your parts museum and leave it at that.
Norm
I'll just mention that I wouldn't design a control arm quite like the ones that belong in your parts museum and leave it at that.
Norm
#19
I took a 60 mile drive today and I like these control arms more and more. You can really feel the flex of the stock arms when you hammer the gas or let off the gas quickly. These really firm up the feel of the rear end. Definitely better than my Che's and just as quiet or possibly more quiet.
At $176, they are the same price as the sphon poly/spherical adjustable lca's. If I had needed adjustable, then i'd have gotten the sphons. I'm glad I didn't, because these are probably more street friendly with the metal ball surrounded by poly bushings.
At $176, they are the same price as the sphon poly/spherical adjustable lca's. If I had needed adjustable, then i'd have gotten the sphons. I'm glad I didn't, because these are probably more street friendly with the metal ball surrounded by poly bushings.
#20
What's this about CHE's parts breaking? I just bought their anti-squat brackets and LCA's from Brenspeed. Bad idea or what? My LCA's aren't adj. though.