barely beat v6??
I ♥ Acer
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,435
From:
RE: barely beat v6??
ORIGINAL: dc_mann8
ive yet to witness them run anywhere near a mid 13, best is a quite high 13, with 90% of them going 14.0-14.2
people claim they can run it, and im sure a really good driver will. same as people say foxes are high 14s, when i have seen my father run 13.97 out of his stock fox and a 14.20 out of my mothers.
as far as my mods.. ive got king cobra clutch, blue thunder shifter, k&n filter, no smog or air silencer, 3:73s, ceramic shorties, 2.5 o/r h pipe, flows, electric fan, etc.
ive yet to witness them run anywhere near a mid 13, best is a quite high 13, with 90% of them going 14.0-14.2
people claim they can run it, and im sure a really good driver will. same as people say foxes are high 14s, when i have seen my father run 13.97 out of his stock fox and a 14.20 out of my mothers.
as far as my mods.. ive got king cobra clutch, blue thunder shifter, k&n filter, no smog or air silencer, 3:73s, ceramic shorties, 2.5 o/r h pipe, flows, electric fan, etc.
I ♥ Acer
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,435
From:
RE: barely beat v6??
ORIGINAL: dc_mann8
trap 98ish
fathers trapped 102 and 101.
and yes magazines claim 13.4, but it isnt the average redneck driver. i have seen 10-15 gts race and no 13.4s
trap 98ish
fathers trapped 102 and 101.
and yes magazines claim 13.4, but it isnt the average redneck driver. i have seen 10-15 gts race and no 13.4s
Retired MF Moderator
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,891
RE: barely beat v6??
ORIGINAL: 757GT
988ish, stock S197s trap 100 to 102 stock. Also there is no way a stock fox will trap 102.
ORIGINAL: dc_mann8
trap 98ish
fathers trapped 102 and 101.
and yes magazines claim 13.4, but it isnt the average redneck driver. i have seen 10-15 gts race and no 13.4s
trap 98ish
fathers trapped 102 and 101.
and yes magazines claim 13.4, but it isnt the average redneck driver. i have seen 10-15 gts race and no 13.4s
5th Gear Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,926
From:
RE: barely beat v6??
ORIGINAL: nanaki
they do in the 5.0 section
ORIGINAL: 757GT
988ish, stock S197s trap 100 to 102 stock. Also there is no way a stock fox will trap 102.
ORIGINAL: dc_mann8
trap 98ish
fathers trapped 102 and 101.
and yes magazines claim 13.4, but it isnt the average redneck driver. i have seen 10-15 gts race and no 13.4s
trap 98ish
fathers trapped 102 and 101.
and yes magazines claim 13.4, but it isnt the average redneck driver. i have seen 10-15 gts race and no 13.4s
Wait for it..........
BURN!
DC:
Where do you live? because apparently your father is channeling all of the driving ability in the area, causing high 14-low 15 second cars to run high 13s, and mid 13 second cars to run like sh*t.
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,985
From: PEI, Canada
RE: barely beat v6??
im not saying foxes all run 13s.. retards, i told you mine with bolt ons only goes low 14, im saying my father pulled high 13s and low low 14s, 13s from the notch and 14s from the hatch, both were bought new in 87 and under 30,000 kilometers, maybe foxes aroudn are beat too much, i know what ive seen them run.
EDIT: careful homeslice. You should know the rules.
EDIT: careful homeslice. You should know the rules.
5th Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,062
From: Pittsburgh/Dayton
RE: barely beat v6??
ORIGINAL: dc_mann8
im not saying foxes all run 13s.. retards, i told you mine with bolt ons only goes low 14, im saying my father pulled high 13s and low low 14s, 13s from the notch and 14s from the hatch, both were bought new in 87 and under 30,000 kilometers, maybe foxes aroudn are beat too much, i know what ive seen them run. so suck my bag.
im not saying foxes all run 13s.. retards, i told you mine with bolt ons only goes low 14, im saying my father pulled high 13s and low low 14s, 13s from the notch and 14s from the hatch, both were bought new in 87 and under 30,000 kilometers, maybe foxes aroudn are beat too much, i know what ive seen them run. so suck my bag.
Apparently not if you 6'ers are hanging on your ***. [sm=alcoholic.gif]
You set yourself up for that one.
I ♥ Acer
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,435
From:
RE: barely beat v6??
ORIGINAL: czwalga00gt
1/4 Mile ET 14.717
1/4 Mile MPH 94.68 MPH
I dont know about you... but i really dont consider 14.7's low 14's. If thats low 14's I must be in the low 13's.
1/4 Mile ET 14.717
1/4 Mile MPH 94.68 MPH
I dont know about you... but i really dont consider 14.7's low 14's. If thats low 14's I must be in the low 13's.
HAHA, good find there.
