M3
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 62
From:
RE: M3
that comment about the 94 to 98 is a complete lye evryone seems to thinks there slow but stock for stock the the 96 4.6 is faster than the stock 94,95 5.0 and the stock 5.0 before that are about a car length behind dont kid yourself there not slow... its just the fox bodys are around alot longer and everyone lye about them being stock .... from what you say that means that a mivan is as fast as an M3 96,98, does anyone street race or just read the stats in the back of the magazines. ohh yah my dad has a infiniti g35 auto that has somehere around 270 hp its an auto but when i pass him in my 95 gt MINIVAN somthings wrong??>>>>>
6th Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,635
From: North Cackilacky
RE: M3
ORIGINAL: connor
that comment about the 94 to 98 is a complete lye evryone seems to thinks there slow but stock for stock the the 96 4.6 is faster than the stock 94,95 5.0 and the stock 5.0 before that are about a car length behind dont kid yourself there not slow... its just the fox bodys are around alot longer and everyone lye about them being stock .... from what you say that means that a mivan is as fast as an M3 96,98, does anyone street race or just read the stats in the back of the magazines. ohh yah my dad has a infiniti g35 auto that has somehere around 270 hp its an auto but when i pass him in my 95 gt MINIVAN somthings wrong??>>>>>
that comment about the 94 to 98 is a complete lye evryone seems to thinks there slow but stock for stock the the 96 4.6 is faster than the stock 94,95 5.0 and the stock 5.0 before that are about a car length behind dont kid yourself there not slow... its just the fox bodys are around alot longer and everyone lye about them being stock .... from what you say that means that a mivan is as fast as an M3 96,98, does anyone street race or just read the stats in the back of the magazines. ohh yah my dad has a infiniti g35 auto that has somehere around 270 hp its an auto but when i pass him in my 95 gt MINIVAN somthings wrong??>>>>>
Dude, what are you trying to prove? Everyone here knows that the 94-98GT's are the slowest ever produced. You're not gonna change that. Your 1/4 mile time is about on my par with my sedan. They're SLOW.
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 62
From:
RE: M3
i guess your right but my best friend has a 88 dt and i beat him by a car ... his is sock .... my other friend has a 98 m3 i beat him his isnt stock my dad has a 04 g 35 its stock i beat him ..... and to go back to college days my friend nick had the 96 the first years and he beat an 87 lx so i dont no why people hate this year ??? i think ther quick ... but coming from my RX7 yah there real slow but to say a minvan is as fast is just uncalled for i thought people here liked fords???
6th Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,635
From: North Cackilacky
RE: M3
Well, as far as I'm concerned, fox's aren't much faster. But nonetheless, they are faster and it's not b/c of more power, just less weight. The GT, wheather some people like it or not, has been **** until the recent 99+ models.
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 62
From:
RE: M3
i will agree to that it does depend on the weight ....but the amount of drivers/pasangers and the amount in the gas in the tank matters but personnly i think stock for stock with all things considered ar close to equal in conparison its just the fact that some one mentioned the seiana minivan pissed me and my friend dave who is an ase mechanic off, like he said horsepower is great but tourqe is what gets you down the road .... can we at least agree on that???
