Street/Strip Raced a guy from a light? Had that ride of yours on the timed track? Tell your story here.

REDLINE VS GT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 08:33 PM
  #61  
JT76's Avatar
JT76
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,967
From: Buffalo, NY
Default RE: REDLINE VS GT

there are alot of those around here......i probably see 1-2 every day.......also did you guys hear about the shop in the midwest thats putting Ls1's or ls2's (?) in these things?
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 08:35 PM
  #62  
WRXtranceformed's Avatar
WRXtranceformed
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,248
From: NC
Default RE: REDLINE VS GT

I know they did that to the Solstice, but I haven't heard of anyone doing that to the Sky...
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 08:35 PM
  #63  
Morbid Intentions's Avatar
Morbid Intentions
Wash Rinse Repeat
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,312
From: Michigan
Default RE: REDLINE VS GT


ORIGINAL: stanggang1892

there are alot of those around here......i probably see 1-2 every day.......also did you guys hear about the shop in the midwest thats putting Ls1's or ls2's (?) in these things?
Mallet.... they are freaking sweet
http://www.mallettcars.com/solstice-conversion.htm

they were talking about the new solstice GXP that is coming out... not the N/A one
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 08:41 PM
  #64  
fiad06's Avatar
fiad06
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,480
From:
Default RE: REDLINE VS GT

DAMNN,Thats insane...they have a ls2 600 hp package, those cars weigh nothing too.........Mr. Rogers....U have competition....
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 09:51 PM
  #65  
Moosehead115's Avatar
Moosehead115
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1
Default RE: REDLINE VS GT

Hey guys, Just coming over from the redline forums here, not trolling, just to say a thing or two...
Personally i too doubt beating 2005 or newer mustang GT's, unless the driver is a complete tool.
I have beaten a couple 2000-2004 mustang GT's myself, on the street, from roll's usually from 2'nd gear going like 60 KM/H which is just a dirty speed for the redline to start from, advantage redline right off the bat. I dont know the exact year of them as I never really had a thing for those years of mustangs so i never learned. point being there that yea it happens. That being said i've also been beaten by 2 or 3 mustangs as well. newer ones, none older then 97, anything before that and they are basicailly decimated once we are up to speed. there arent any modified ones older then that around here, if they are they are trailer queens. Total props to the mustang, As i previously was an owner of a '92 LX 5.0 Auto before i got the redline (351w swap anyone?) never did get that one to the track though. Currently my redline is capable of running 14.2's if i got my reaction time down, and thats with 300 bucks into the motor, It's pretty impressive in my eyes, even from a land of cheap horsepower.

What i'm trying to say is, we all have cars that have lots of untapped potential, and depending on the mods, or the stupidity of the driver in whichever car, mustangs will be beaten by econobox blown 4's, and redline's will be beaten by the ponies.

Couple things for you guys to know as well (interesting knowledge, might make you respect the redlines a bit more)
Same motor as the Cobalt SS, 2.0l Ecotech, with changing of the pistons, possibly even without, (no other internals, rods etc.)can be built to approx 400 HP.
not saying we all have that, or ever will, it'd take effort and tech, but its a stout powerplant.



..... oh and LittleMT's neon would eat you alive. not a dig... just my humble opinion.
Kisses MT.
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 10:06 PM
  #66  
Morbid Intentions's Avatar
Morbid Intentions
Wash Rinse Repeat
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,312
From: Michigan
Default RE: REDLINE VS GT


ORIGINAL: Moosehead115

Hey guys, Just coming over from the redline forums here, not trolling, just to say a thing or two...
Personally i too doubt beating 2005 or newer mustang GT's, unless the driver is a complete tool.
I have beaten a couple 2000-2004 mustang GT's myself, on the street, from roll's usually from 2'nd gear going like 60 KM/H which is just a dirty speed for the redline to start from, advantage redline right off the bat. I dont know the exact year of them as I never really had a thing for those years of mustangs so i never learned. point being there that yea it happens. That being said i've also been beaten by 2 or 3 mustangs as well. newer ones, none older then 97, anything before that and they are basicailly decimated once we are up to speed. there arent any modified ones older then that around here, if they are they are trailer queens. Total props to the mustang, As i previously was an owner of a '92 LX 5.0 Auto before i got the redline (351w swap anyone?) never did get that one to the track though. Currently my redline is capable of running 14.2's if i got my reaction time down, and thats with 300 bucks into the motor, It's pretty impressive in my eyes, even from a land of cheap horsepower.

What i'm trying to say is, we all have cars that have lots of untapped potential, and depending on the mods, or the stupidity of the driver in whichever car, mustangs will be beaten by econobox blown 4's, and redline's will be beaten by the ponies.

Couple things for you guys to know as well (interesting knowledge, might make you respect the redlines a bit more)
Same motor as the Cobalt SS, 2.0l Ecotech, with changing of the pistons, possibly even without, (no other internals, rods etc.) to approx 400 HP.
not saying we all have that, or ever will, it'd take effort and tech, but its a stout powerplant.



..... oh and LittleMT's neon would eat you alive. not a dig... just my humble opinion.
Kisses MT.
if everyone at redline forums post like you there wouldn't be a stink. and I for one don't consider you a troll for posting facts... just the one post of that one redline with the 14.7-14.8 in his sig spewing out how he creames 00-04's left and right.. posts like that really stir things up because it's so far from believable it sparks a BS wagon to follow suit
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 11:41 PM
  #67  
snakeman4life's Avatar
snakeman4life
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,209
From:
Default RE: REDLINE VS GT


ORIGINAL: Moosehead115

Hey guys, Just coming over from the redline forums here, not trolling, just to say a thing or two...
Personally i too doubt beating 2005 or newer mustang GT's, unless the driver is a complete tool.
I have beaten a couple 2000-2004 mustang GT's myself, on the street, from roll's usually from 2'nd gear going like 60 KM/H which is just a dirty speed for the redline to start from, advantage redline right off the bat. I dont know the exact year of them as I never really had a thing for those years of mustangs so i never learned. point being there that yea it happens. That being said i've also been beaten by 2 or 3 mustangs as well. newer ones, none older then 97, anything before that and they are basicailly decimated once we are up to speed. there arent any modified ones older then that around here, if they are they are trailer queens. Total props to the mustang, As i previously was an owner of a '92 LX 5.0 Auto before i got the redline (351w swap anyone?) never did get that one to the track though. Currently my redline is capable of running 14.2's if i got my reaction time down, and thats with 300 bucks into the motor, It's pretty impressive in my eyes, even from a land of cheap horsepower.

What i'm trying to say is, we all have cars that have lots of untapped potential, and depending on the mods, or the stupidity of the driver in whichever car, mustangs will be beaten by econobox blown 4's, and redline's will be beaten by the ponies.

Couple things for you guys to know as well (interesting knowledge, might make you respect the redlines a bit more)
Same motor as the Cobalt SS, 2.0l Ecotech, with changing of the pistons, possibly even without, (no other internals, rods etc.)can be built to approx 400 HP.
not saying we all have that, or ever will, it'd take effort and tech, but its a stout powerplant.



..... oh and LittleMT's neon would eat you alive. not a dig... just my humble opinion.
Kisses MT.
+1 Look,I don't have a Ion,but I do have the Cobalt,which is more or less the same car,and I've owned a '98 and '00 GT,so I think I'm as unbiased as possible either way.Stock to stock,from a dig with equal drivers the 99-04 gt would win,I haven't really messed around alot with mine from a dead stop[need to break it in]but I tried to launch it a couple times and it seems pretty hard to launch,alot harder than my cobra,even with 4.30 gears.Now with a good driver in the Cobalt/Ion vs. a bad-average driver in the stang,the Cobalt/Ion could win.From a roll it's really a drivers race,both cars generally trap 96-100mph so whoever can shift better should win.Of course it also depends on the speed they start from,since stangs have 3.27 gears stock and Cobalt/Ions are 4.0X,one car could be in a better gear for their powerband than the other,it all depends.Bottom line is,if someone says they killed one car or the other one more than a carlength or two,they didn't beat the car they beat the driver.BTW i'm actually pretty impressed with the build quality of the cobalt,alot better than cavaliers,and I think the interior is nicer than the Cobras',but it's also 5 years newer,however I still like driving the Cobra better,no amount of boost in a 4 banger can equal the feel and sound of a V8[even if it's faster].Just my $.02
Old Jul 27, 2006 | 01:31 AM
  #68  
JD1969's Avatar
JD1969
Pro. B.S. caller outer
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 9,644
From: IL
Default RE: REDLINE VS GT


ORIGINAL: Moosehead115

Hey guys, Just coming over from the redline forums here, not trolling, just to say a thing or two...
Personally i too doubt beating 2005 or newer mustang GT's, unless the driver is a complete tool.
I have beaten a couple 2000-2004 mustang GT's myself, on the street, from roll's usually from 2'nd gear going like 60 KM/H which is just a dirty speed for the redline to start from, advantage redline right off the bat. I dont know the exact year of them as I never really had a thing for those years of mustangs so i never learned. point being there that yea it happens. That being said i've also been beaten by 2 or 3 mustangs as well. newer ones, none older then 97, anything before that and they are basicailly decimated once we are up to speed. there arent any modified ones older then that around here, if they are they are trailer queens. Total props to the mustang, As i previously was an owner of a '92 LX 5.0 Auto before i got the redline (351w swap anyone?) never did get that one to the track though. Currently my redline is capable of running 14.2's if i got my reaction time down, and thats with 300 bucks into the motor, It's pretty impressive in my eyes, even from a land of cheap horsepower.

What i'm trying to say is, we all have cars that have lots of untapped potential, and depending on the mods, or the stupidity of the driver in whichever car, mustangs will be beaten by econobox blown 4's, and redline's will be beaten by the ponies.

Couple things for you guys to know as well (interesting knowledge, might make you respect the redlines a bit more)
Same motor as the Cobalt SS, 2.0l Ecotech, with changing of the pistons, possibly even without, (no other internals, rods etc.)can be built to approx 400 HP.
not saying we all have that, or ever will, it'd take effort and tech, but its a stout powerplant.



..... oh and LittleMT's neon would eat you alive. not a dig... just my humble opinion.
Kisses MT.
Yea....um... reaction time has no effect what-so-ever on elapsed time.[>:]
Old Jul 27, 2006 | 01:37 AM
  #69  
Shaybuttainbk's Avatar
Shaybuttainbk
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 388
From:
Default RE: REDLINE VS GT

i didn't even know what an ion was til yesterday
Old Jul 27, 2006 | 02:22 AM
  #70  
fiad06's Avatar
fiad06
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,480
From:
Default RE: REDLINE VS GT

I like your pic shay, but i wouldnt trust them washing my car, especially in ur case its black, make sure they dont drop the sponge on the floor and get little rocks in it, then it will scratch your sexy black...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:02 AM.