Street/Strip Raced a guy from a light? Had that ride of yours on the timed track? Tell your story here.

lt1 vs ls1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 04:22 PM
  #11  
stanger88's Avatar
stanger88
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,541
From:
Default RE: lt1 vs ls1

Ls1 stuff doesnt really cost that much guys. They also come with GREAT heads from the factory, I dare say you could get to the 500whp mark in an LS1 cheaper than you could in a 4.6L 99-04 (year/year comparison to LS1)
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 04:23 PM
  #12  
yellowgtstang18's Avatar
yellowgtstang18
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,605
From: Indianapolis
Default RE: lt1 vs ls1

Thats it to beat a ls1, is a cat back and headers and cai...
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 05:24 PM
  #13  
72MachOne99GT's Avatar
72MachOne99GT
2010 Blue Ball Award Recipient
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,907
From: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
Default RE: lt1 vs ls1

They also come with GREAT heads from the factory, I dare say you could get to the 500whp mark in an LS1 cheaper than you could in a 4.6L 99-04 (year/year comparison to LS1)
did you just throw that out there for fun? or was someone actually saying otherwise??

Old Dec 7, 2006 | 05:26 PM
  #14  
98LS1's Avatar
98LS1
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,635
From: North Cackilacky
Default RE: lt1 vs ls1


ORIGINAL: SSteele

Nope. LT1s are somehow quicker with less power. An intake, LTs, and catback is good for 260-280rwhp which is enough to run with stock LS1s. Ick, I was also including a tune...
How do you figure that? LS1 weighs the same, has equal gearing, has a better power curve....please explain.
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 05:29 PM
  #15  
98Camarod's Avatar
98Camarod
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 55
From:
Default RE: lt1 vs ls1

I agree, it takes much more than that for an lt1 to run with an ls1. Usually full bolt ons and a slightly hotter cam should run with a stock ls1.
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 05:44 PM
  #16  
stanger88's Avatar
stanger88
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,541
From:
Default RE: lt1 vs ls1


ORIGINAL: 72MachOne99GT

They also come with GREAT heads from the factory, I dare say you could get to the 500whp mark in an LS1 cheaper than you could in a 4.6L 99-04 (year/year comparison to LS1)
did you just throw that out there for fun? or was someone actually saying otherwise??


I threw that out there for the people saying stuff was cheaper for mustangs...maybe by a little, but the power returns are way less.
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 05:45 PM
  #17  
stanger88's Avatar
stanger88
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,541
From:
Default RE: lt1 vs ls1


ORIGINAL: 98Camarod

I agree, it takes much more than that for an lt1 to run with an ls1. Usually full bolt ons and a slightly hotter cam should run with a stock ls1.

yep, they need a cam so they dont fall off in the low 5K rpm range.
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 06:09 PM
  #18  
Dingo0079's Avatar
Dingo0079
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 579
From: Orlando, Florida
Default RE: lt1 vs ls1

lol....
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 07:18 PM
  #19  
TommyV8's Avatar
TommyV8
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,438
From: St. Louis
Default RE: lt1 vs ls1

All else being equal it's approximately a .8 difference, so whatever it takes to shave off .8.
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 09:22 PM
  #20  
98LS1's Avatar
98LS1
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,635
From: North Cackilacky
Default RE: lt1 vs ls1


ORIGINAL: stanger88

I threw that out there for the people saying stuff was cheaper for mustangs...maybe by a little, but the power returns are way less.
Maybe if you're talking about 302 pushrod parts....but not OHC stuff. Hell, the LS1 aftermarket as almost become as large as any aftermarket for any car to date. It is the new SBC for all the old hotrodders.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:20 AM.