Street/Strip Raced a guy from a light? Had that ride of yours on the timed track? Tell your story here.

GSX eclipse vs Mustang GT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 03:35 PM
  #41  
2000GT4.6's Avatar
2000GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,575
From: United States
Default RE: GSX eclipse vs Mustang GT

I think you guys have a misconception of how the eclipse's "launch".

On a stock car you cannot do a STI style "hold it to the floor and drop the clutch" launch. Do that on a stock GSX and I give you MAYBE 3 times before the transmission case gets penetrated by something covered in bearing fragments

My brother owned a 90 TSI turbo AWD. From a stop (stock vs stock basically), with the "best safe" launch he could get, I could simply let out the clutch easy and floor the car once it was all the way out... and W A L K em.

Its not even a race.
Old Apr 29, 2007 | 07:01 PM
  #42  
BoOsTeDeAgLe's Avatar
BoOsTeDeAgLe
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 275
From: Cincinnati
Default RE: GSX eclipse vs Mustang GT

The biggest question is how much boost is this guy running?You could take a 1g dsm, make a $15 boost controller, drop the cat-back so it's open downpipe, run 13's and still call it stock (that's just a technicality). This is harder to do on a 2g though, it's turbo, intercooler piping, and blow-off valve are TeHSuCK.If it's running 14psi (stock for a 2g)or lower i'd give it to the mustang, it would need at least 17psi on the stock turbofor a good race.
Old Apr 29, 2007 | 07:26 PM
  #43  
2000GT4.6's Avatar
2000GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,575
From: United States
Default RE: GSX eclipse vs Mustang GT

ORIGINAL: BoOsTeDeAgLe

The biggest question is how much boost is this guy running?You could take a 1g dsm, make a $15 boost controller, drop the cat-back so it's open downpipe, run 13's and still call it stock (that's just a technicality). This is harder to do on a 2g though, it's turbo, intercooler piping, and blow-off valve are TeHSuCK.If it's running 14psi (stock for a 2g)or lower i'd give it to the mustang, it would need at least 17psi on the stock turbofor a good race.
The things youre talking about are "best case senerio" stuff though. Some guy on some forum did it once.. not gonna happen every time with every driver (or even close).

I have never ran into any eclipse that had anything for my car, all the way from stock up to now. I am sure they are out there.. but its not very common.
Old Apr 29, 2007 | 07:41 PM
  #44  
Morbid Intentions's Avatar
Morbid Intentions
Wash Rinse Repeat
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,312
From: Michigan
Default RE: GSX eclipse vs Mustang GT

IDK what this thread was about... but thereliablility thing is no lie..... an idiot with a 4th gen ran stock boost on me in a FWD model.... I took him

then he upped the boost to 19PSI (that's what he told me)

#1 he was fuel cutting like crazy

#2 hisengine messed up during the run

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/6...2b00f28ebd.htm

the car would be crazy fast with the proper turbo/injectors and boost controlling application as you can plainly see... but most are sadly driven by people like the posted
Old Apr 29, 2007 | 11:10 PM
  #45  
The_Third_Horseman's Avatar
The_Third_Horseman
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 288
From:
Default RE: GSX eclipse vs Mustang GT

ORIGINAL: BoOsTeDeAgLe

The biggest question is how much boost is this guy running?You could take a 1g dsm, make a $15 boost controller, drop the cat-back so it's open downpipe, run 13's and still call it stock (that's just a technicality). This is harder to do on a 2g though, it's turbo, intercooler piping, and blow-off valve are TeHSuCK.If it's running 14psi (stock for a 2g)or lower i'd give it to the mustang, it would need at least 17psi on the stock turbofor a good race.
Stock 1990 Eagle Talon TSi AWD 0-60 in 6.8 and 1/4 mile in 15.2. Your tellin me those mods drop the ET over 1.2 seconds?
Old May 1, 2007 | 03:58 PM
  #46  
BoOsTeDeAgLe's Avatar
BoOsTeDeAgLe
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 275
From: Cincinnati
Default RE: GSX eclipse vs Mustang GT

ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6

ORIGINAL: BoOsTeDeAgLe

The biggest question is how much boost is this guy running?You could take a 1g dsm, make a $15 boost controller, drop the cat-back so it's open downpipe, run 13's and still call it stock (that's just a technicality). This is harder to do on a 2g though, it's turbo, intercooler piping, and blow-off valve are TeHSuCK.If it's running 14psi (stock for a 2g)or lower i'd give it to the mustang, it would need at least 17psi on the stock turbofor a good race.
The things youre talking about are "best case senerio" stuff though. Some guy on some forum did it once.. not gonna happen every time with every driver (or even close).

I have never ran into any eclipse that had anything for my car, all the way from stock up to now. I am sure they are out there.. but its not very common.
No that's not forum talk, that's actual experience, I drove my car like that for a whilebefore I had my exhaust made. Again, that's just with the 1g's though, they are lighter, have the better turbo, and better i/c piping.
Old May 1, 2007 | 04:00 PM
  #47  
BoOsTeDeAgLe's Avatar
BoOsTeDeAgLe
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 275
From: Cincinnati
Default RE: GSX eclipse vs Mustang GT

ORIGINAL: The_Third_Horseman

ORIGINAL: BoOsTeDeAgLe

The biggest question is how much boost is this guy running?You could take a 1g dsm, make a $15 boost controller, drop the cat-back so it's open downpipe, run 13's and still call it stock (that's just a technicality). This is harder to do on a 2g though, it's turbo, intercooler piping, and blow-off valve are TeHSuCK.If it's running 14psi (stock for a 2g)or lower i'd give it to the mustang, it would need at least 17psi on the stock turbofor a good race.
Stock 1990 Eagle Talon TSi AWD 0-60 in 6.8 and 1/4 mile in 15.2. Your tellin me those mods drop the ET over 1.2 seconds?
Yea, I know it's hard to believe, but remember stock boost is 8psi. Even up it tojust 15psi and your in a wholedifferent animal, I'm sure ROTM will vouch for that one.
Old May 1, 2007 | 04:09 PM
  #48  
Demon 340's Avatar
Demon 340
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 16,186
From: yep
Default RE: GSX eclipse vs Mustang GT

not just me, but any turbo owner can testify as to how much something as simple as a cheap boost controller, and removing things can make the car MUCH faster. ive seen otherwise stock Evo 8s with an MBC and good tires run in the mid 12s...not common, but possible.

2000GT4.6, youre talking about your heavily modded car walking turbo DSMs..and i should hope that is the case unless something is wrong with your car. With street tires, I can launch my 1g around 3 grand with very little tire spin, and it grips and goes. Would it keep up with your car? hell no! Would it keep pace with a stock auto new edge GT? I bet that it would. There are also "free mods" that you cannot visually point out, such as a piped cat, or balance shaft and AC removal. These are items that add small amounts of power, but also increase the rpm speed and the "spool time" of the DSM...especially the balance shafts and cat removal.
Old May 1, 2007 | 04:15 PM
  #49  
WRXtranceformed's Avatar
WRXtranceformed
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,248
From: NC
Default RE: GSX eclipse vs Mustang GT

Plus, catless exhaust + atmosphere venting BOV = Flames out of your exhaust!!! [sm=badbadbad.gif]
Old May 1, 2007 | 04:19 PM
  #50  
Demon 340's Avatar
Demon 340
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 16,186
From: yep
Default RE: GSX eclipse vs Mustang GT

no ABOV for me...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 PM.