me vs. s2000
I ♥ Acer
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,136
From:
RE: me vs. s2000
ORIGINAL: stanggang1892
my auto dynoed about 220rwhp stock a manual will do around 230 from what i have seen on the dynojet
ORIGINAL: Morbid Intentions
230-240 RWHP is the norm for a new edge.... do some research before you dig your hole of BS deeper than it already is
230-240 RWHP is the norm for a new edge.... do some research before you dig your hole of BS deeper than it already is
Correct on a dyno jet, since a dyno jet will read higher than a mustang dyno
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 188
From:
RE: me vs. s2000
We have told the guy that he will probably lose. How about everyone calm down for second, and stop arguing about Horsepower.
Hey V6 guy, just get everything on video and post it here. Then if you when you can prove all of us wrong.
-Justin
Hey V6 guy, just get everything on video and post it here. Then if you when you can prove all of us wrong.
-Justin
I ♥ Acer
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,136
From:
RE: me vs. s2000
ORIGINAL: Morbid Intentions
230-240 RWHP is the norm for a new edge.... do some research before you dig your hole of BS deeper than it already is
230-240 RWHP is the norm for a new edge.... do some research before you dig your hole of BS deeper than it already is
OK I am not going to go back and forth with someone who is to young to reliaze your wrong.
Mustang dyno will read lower than a Dyno jet and IMO is mustang dyno is closer to real street hp than a dyno jet reads. But if you had half a brain and could do math, 8% drivetrain loss on a New Edge Mustang GT is not possible. Just not man. How you call me BS, which makes no sense, but I have worked in a Performace shop. I have ran Mustang Dyno's and Land and sea dyno and actually know how to dyno tune a car. But I dont care what kind of car you have 8% drivetrain loss is not possible.
This is the primary reason why I dont come in this seaction, though there are allot guys who know what there talking about but your not one them. Not your fault, just misimformed........
Wash Rinse Repeat
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,312
From: Michigan
RE: me vs. s2000
I'm not the one that came in talking about musang dyno's... the kid came in... said he thought he dyno'd around 210RWHP.. (obviosly on a dynojet)
there was no insinuation of mustang dyno or dyno jet untill you brought it up.... a car dyno's what it dyno's.... you get a sheet of paper and that's what it goes by, for you to say it's wrong because of the type of dyno is rather retarted
it's sad someone can't ask a question without BS callsflying across the screen based on a sub statemnet of his original question.. (in which the sub statement was 100% correct)
you just automatically insinuated a mustang dyno into the equation and made a big deal about something we aren't even talking about... if you knew we were talking about dyno jets in the first place, then why call BS?
It's a true claim for what we were dealing with... your mustang dyno, your 99GT, mustang GT numbers, or your personal preference in dyno's have nothing to do with the thread at hand tough guy
now to get back on the topic besides horsepower and dyno 101 with you, the S2000 will win in the end... 210 RWHP 190RWHP 180RWHP 42RWHP.. it will still win
there was no insinuation of mustang dyno or dyno jet untill you brought it up.... a car dyno's what it dyno's.... you get a sheet of paper and that's what it goes by, for you to say it's wrong because of the type of dyno is rather retarted
it's sad someone can't ask a question without BS callsflying across the screen based on a sub statemnet of his original question.. (in which the sub statement was 100% correct)
you just automatically insinuated a mustang dyno into the equation and made a big deal about something we aren't even talking about... if you knew we were talking about dyno jets in the first place, then why call BS?
It's a true claim for what we were dealing with... your mustang dyno, your 99GT, mustang GT numbers, or your personal preference in dyno's have nothing to do with the thread at hand tough guy
now to get back on the topic besides horsepower and dyno 101 with you, the S2000 will win in the end... 210 RWHP 190RWHP 180RWHP 42RWHP.. it will still win
I ♥ Acer
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,136
From:
RE: me vs. s2000
ORIGINAL: Morbid Intentions
I'm not the one that came in talking about musang dyno's... the kid came in... said he thought he dyno'd around 210RWHP.. (obviosly on a dynojet)
there was no insinuation of mustang dyno or dyno jet untill you brought it up.... a car dyno's what it dyno's.... you get a sheet of paper and that's what it goes by, for you to say it's wrong because of the type of dyno is rather retarted
it's sad someone can't ask a question without BS callsflying across the screen based on a sub statemnet of his original question.. (in which the sub statement was 100% correct)
you just automatically insinuated a mustang dyno into the equation and made a big deal about something we aren't even talking about... if you knew we were talking about dyno jets in the first place, then why call BS?
It's a true claim for what we were dealing with... your mustang dyno, your 99GT, mustang GT numbers, or your personal preference in dyno's have nothing to do with the thread at hand tough guy
now to get back on the topic besides horsepower and dyno 101 with you, the S2000 will win in the end... 210 RWHP 190RWHP 180RWHP 42RWHP.. it will still win
I'm not the one that came in talking about musang dyno's... the kid came in... said he thought he dyno'd around 210RWHP.. (obviosly on a dynojet)
there was no insinuation of mustang dyno or dyno jet untill you brought it up.... a car dyno's what it dyno's.... you get a sheet of paper and that's what it goes by, for you to say it's wrong because of the type of dyno is rather retarted
it's sad someone can't ask a question without BS callsflying across the screen based on a sub statemnet of his original question.. (in which the sub statement was 100% correct)
you just automatically insinuated a mustang dyno into the equation and made a big deal about something we aren't even talking about... if you knew we were talking about dyno jets in the first place, then why call BS?
It's a true claim for what we were dealing with... your mustang dyno, your 99GT, mustang GT numbers, or your personal preference in dyno's have nothing to do with the thread at hand tough guy
now to get back on the topic besides horsepower and dyno 101 with you, the S2000 will win in the end... 210 RWHP 190RWHP 180RWHP 42RWHP.. it will still win
Alright man you win. I can tell your the type that likes to get people going, so no worries man. This got out of hand and we will leave it anyway you would like.
We can agree about one thing, the S2000 will win!
5th Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,003
From:
RE: me vs. s2000
ORIGINAL: Morbid Intentions
+1 it's a shame people compare RWHP numbers to a totally different car and say it's impossible because joe shmoe mobile runs high 13's with just 10 more RWHP.... even though there are way more factors than just RWHP between the GT and the V6.... and the GT dynos at 260RWHP bud..
the new edge GT's dyno at around 240 RWHP
you guys can compare cars all day long... facts are facts a 93 octane tune with a CAI and a catback does just exactly what it was intended for.. 200-210 RWHP
and if you want to compare the GT to the 4.0 I guess 20RWHP from just a tune is impossible too huh?
http://www.alternativeauto.com/prods...tang_tune.html
specter... you know nothing about this subject and it shows... stop posting
+1 it's a shame people compare RWHP numbers to a totally different car and say it's impossible because joe shmoe mobile runs high 13's with just 10 more RWHP.... even though there are way more factors than just RWHP between the GT and the V6.... and the GT dynos at 260RWHP bud..
the new edge GT's dyno at around 240 RWHP
you guys can compare cars all day long... facts are facts a 93 octane tune with a CAI and a catback does just exactly what it was intended for.. 200-210 RWHP
and if you want to compare the GT to the 4.0 I guess 20RWHP from just a tune is impossible too huh?
http://www.alternativeauto.com/prods...tang_tune.html
specter... you know nothing about this subject and it shows... stop posting
meh, so the 4.0 aint my forte. things seemed a little high and after looking at the 1st page which i missed
u guys convinced me. but ur being a little zealous on the new edge numbers. ive never seen a 2v put down 240 stock. 230 on a good day, but 220 isnt uncommon either.i would like to point out that we each err on the opposite sides of our argument about the same, so next time dont point ur emo death pissy-ray at me when im a hair off
my only real mistake here was not reading the first page.
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 375
From:
RE: me vs. s2000
His horsepower is irrelevant. You're gonna need more than those mods to hang with an s2000. Like someone said before, just get it on tape, maybe the s2k driver just started driving and you'll win.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Diode Dynamics
Vendor For Sale / Group Buy Classifieds
28
May 26, 2022 12:02 PM
