just wondering
ORIGINAL: red94gt
i was looking at the new edge mustangs an was just wondering how much faster they are stock for stockthan a sn95 5.0
i was looking at the new edge mustangs an was just wondering how much faster they are stock for stockthan a sn95 5.0
2010 Blue Ball Award Recipient
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,907
From: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
The same reason that they buy 96-98 4.6's.
Cheap, fun to drive.
But the 94-95's are cheap, easy to modify with the 5.0, and I'm starting to like the way they look more and more. Not as much as my New Edge, but still. They're definately growing on me.
Too bad I VERY rarely see a 94-98 GT.....
Cheap, fun to drive.
But the 94-95's are cheap, easy to modify with the 5.0, and I'm starting to like the way they look more and more. Not as much as my New Edge, but still. They're definately growing on me.
Too bad I VERY rarely see a 94-98 GT.....
I'd say that the SN95's are not that much faster. If you put exhaust, intake, and tune on a fox, it will be practially equal with the sn95's. SN95's were low-to-mid 14 sec. cars. Fox's were high 14's to low 15's. Of course this all depended on the driver.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lincolnshibuya
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
9
Dec 8, 2015 04:37 PM



