LS1s...
01-27-2008, 12:29 AM
#23
Mustang Nazi
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Texas, baby
Posts: 13,444
RE: LS1s...
ORIGINAL: SStompU
Sick looking ride! N/A 2v what tho?...4.6? 347??....
ORIGINAL: 1SLO85
Just a little N/A 2V here. I ain't skeered either. Oh and BTW, LS1's love the rear of my puffstang...LOL
Just a little N/A 2V here. I ain't skeered either. Oh and BTW, LS1's love the rear of my puffstang...LOL
01-27-2008, 12:30 AM
#24
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 75
RE: LS1s...
ORIGINAL: mustangman5089
LS1's see my tail lights all the time when I drive by them on the side of the road waiting for a tow truck.
LS1's see my tail lights all the time when I drive by them on the side of the road waiting for a tow truck.
01-27-2008, 12:32 AM
#26
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 732
RE: LS1s...
the 4.6 is down pretty big on displacement compared to the LS1. the 24-valve 4.6's don't have such a hard time because the 3-valve-per-cylinder heads flow a lot better, but the 16-valves would need the usual bolt-ons + cams+ ported heads, or forced induction.
01-27-2008, 12:36 AM
#27
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 75
RE: LS1s...
ORIGINAL: texas_stang02
the 4.6 is down pretty big on displacement compared to the LS1. the 24-valve 4.6's don't have such a hard time because the 3-valve-per-cylinder heads flow a lot better, but the 16-valves would need the usual bolt-ons + cams+ ported heads, or forced induction.
the 4.6 is down pretty big on displacement compared to the LS1. the 24-valve 4.6's don't have such a hard time because the 3-valve-per-cylinder heads flow a lot better, but the 16-valves would need the usual bolt-ons + cams+ ported heads, or forced induction.