infinity G37S

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Mar 4, 2008 | 11:45 AM

#31

mac10chap

Thread Starter

4th Gear Member

Joined: Feb 2005

Posts: 1,660

From: houston, tx

RE: infinity G37S

350 at the crank??? yall look at my dyno sheet on my pics...i dyno'd at 315HP and 333TQ and that was before i had my car retuned...i am over 325RWHP and 340TQ now. sorry, didnt know that they have 330 stock, so call it 60ish more HP...He may have let off, but "right after I did too", he was still wizzing right on up to me, which makes me think that he hadnt let off...

thanks for the confidence delstang05, however, i am not one of the guys that gets on here and tries to make people believe that i raped a 911T by 6 car lengths on a race track or something...nor did i lay a tape measure down and check the distance between us. a simple guestimation on my part...for the sake of arguement, let's justsay he was "way back there"...

Mar 4, 2008 | 02:39 PM

#32

scg87

5th Gear Member

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 2,250

From: NoDak

RE: infinity G37S

The new G37 has dynoed as high as 293 completely stock btw....

mac- Nice run. The guy may have given you a better run that what he did, but he still would've lost, so I still say nice kill.....

Mar 4, 2008 | 02:56 PM

#33

USMCrebel

Mach I Section Moderator

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 7,140

From: round abouts these parts

RE: infinity G37S

Quote:

ORIGINAL: scg87

The new G37 has dynoed as high as 293 completely stock btw....

mac- Nice run. The guy may have given you a better run that what he did, but he still would've lost, so I still say nice kill.....

thats some good numbers, but playing catch up is a bitch.

Mar 4, 2008 | 02:57 PM

#34

Projectquick

5th Gear Member

Joined: Aug 2007

Posts: 2,445

From: Jersey

RE: infinity G37S

Quote:

ORIGINAL: gas_meet_foot

Quote:

ORIGINAL: mac10chap

the car really was no slouch and they look awesome...i just dont think he realized that i had almost 100HP more than he did. the only exterior mod i have is my tires/rims, eibach pro kit, exhaust, and a shorter antenna..other than that, the car looks stock

i'm sure stock for stock, it would be pretty close...closer than any GT owner would want to be against a v6

I don't know about 100 more horsepower. The G37s are factory-rated 330 at the crank. You are maybe 350 at the crank, weight about the same, and are less aerodynamic. The Gs also have an extra gear (unless he was auto).

You have to remember that the extra gear is to make up for the first five being rather aggresive. I have never driven a g37, but in a g35 1st through 5th pulls pretty good but in 6th it kind of falls on its face after 125-130.

Mar 4, 2008 | 05:23 PM

#35

delstang05

1st Gear Member

Joined: Oct 2005

Posts: 99

From:

RE: infinity G37S

Quote:

ORIGINAL: mac10chap

350 at the crank??? yall look at my dyno sheet on my pics...i dyno'd at 315HP and 333TQ and that was before i had my car retuned...i am over 325RWHP and 340TQ now. sorry, didnt know that they have 330 stock, so call it 60ish more HP...He may have let off, but "right after I did too", he was still wizzing right on up to me, which makes me think that he hadnt let off...

thanks for the confidence delstang05, however, i am not one of the guys that gets on here and tries to make people believe that i raped a 911T by 6 car lengths on a race track or something...nor did i lay a tape measure down and check the distance between us. a simple guestimation on my part...for the sake of arguement, let's justsay he was "way back there"...

I believe that you pulled on him and I'm not trying to be a ***** about measuring. It's just that no one is gonna believe you on here when your saying you pulled on a car that traps 106mphby 10-15 lengths. My car is comparable to your car in many ways and I've driven numerous G37's so I just wanna get the facts straight.