Took down an E55 AMG
ORIGINAL: fazm
ya thats 1 angle. from almost any other angle they look nothing alike since there is no exhaust side to a centri.
if a centri and a turbo were sitting on a table next to each other, you could tell them apart from quite a distance. to me that means they do not look alike.
ya thats 1 angle. from almost any other angle they look nothing alike since there is no exhaust side to a centri.
if a centri and a turbo were sitting on a table next to each other, you could tell them apart from quite a distance. to me that means they do not look alike.
Obviously.... There is a difference in looking "alike" and looking the "same". Really your just being a smart ***. Here I'll make you happy, the COMPRESSOR housing's of each look "alike" or even better yet, they are the "same". From first glance, someone with little knowledge couldn't tell the difference, especially how some of the centri's sit in the engine bay, you can't see the pulley side very clear.
ORIGINAL: fazm
i agree im splitting hairs.
but someone with little knowledge wouldnt really be worrying bout the difference. more like "hey whats that?" lol
i agree im splitting hairs.
but someone with little knowledge wouldnt really be worrying bout the difference. more like "hey whats that?" lol
Thanks for the info guys.
OneFastEclipse- The term Belt-driven turbo is just the slang way of putting it. However, with my Vortech, at least the way the guys at Vortech explained this. Until I go into boost, the system actually "powers" my motor down, almost to completely stock form, for everyday driving, and improved gas mileage. IMO a turbo and a roots/Ts style blower are harder on a motor then a centri. But, I know Turbos are very efficient as well as ts/roots blowers. The only reason I say mine is, simply because until I hit 3K RPM, my car is practically stock.
Fazm- Damn man, you drive too much. I've got close to 15K in one year. Damn!!!!!! Also, if someone did not have a lot of knowledge about turbos, and centri's, they'd think they were the same and operated. Sure, the angle of that pic is just showing the end of the blower/turbo you will see when looking at your engine. Flip it around, and it is totally different.
Also, I think the fastest my Vortech ever spun was 76,000 RPM, which was on the dyno, according to the data from the machine. I though that was fast, but damn, 150-200,000 RPM WTF!!!!!!!!! I think I am either doing a 4V swap with TT's, or building my 3V with a ST.
OneFastEclipse- What you mentioned about the TS VS. Centri is not exactly true. I race a buds Mach 1 twice from a roll, from about 45ish-60. He has an Eaton, 4.36 gears, and puts down 430, 400+ torque. This was before I got a lilttle boost in power with my mid-pipe. We hit it at the exact same time, he instantly put a half car, and after we hit 90, I stopped his pull, and I started to edge up to him to about 105 when he shut down. So, in most cases yes, TS/Roots could beat Centri's without extreme effort, but, us having similar power cars, and my setup with the tune I have, top end is where my car moves out pretty well... Just my. 02
OneFastEclipse- The term Belt-driven turbo is just the slang way of putting it. However, with my Vortech, at least the way the guys at Vortech explained this. Until I go into boost, the system actually "powers" my motor down, almost to completely stock form, for everyday driving, and improved gas mileage. IMO a turbo and a roots/Ts style blower are harder on a motor then a centri. But, I know Turbos are very efficient as well as ts/roots blowers. The only reason I say mine is, simply because until I hit 3K RPM, my car is practically stock.
Fazm- Damn man, you drive too much. I've got close to 15K in one year. Damn!!!!!! Also, if someone did not have a lot of knowledge about turbos, and centri's, they'd think they were the same and operated. Sure, the angle of that pic is just showing the end of the blower/turbo you will see when looking at your engine. Flip it around, and it is totally different.
Also, I think the fastest my Vortech ever spun was 76,000 RPM, which was on the dyno, according to the data from the machine. I though that was fast, but damn, 150-200,000 RPM WTF!!!!!!!!! I think I am either doing a 4V swap with TT's, or building my 3V with a ST.

OneFastEclipse- What you mentioned about the TS VS. Centri is not exactly true. I race a buds Mach 1 twice from a roll, from about 45ish-60. He has an Eaton, 4.36 gears, and puts down 430, 400+ torque. This was before I got a lilttle boost in power with my mid-pipe. We hit it at the exact same time, he instantly put a half car, and after we hit 90, I stopped his pull, and I started to edge up to him to about 105 when he shut down. So, in most cases yes, TS/Roots could beat Centri's without extreme effort, but, us having similar power cars, and my setup with the tune I have, top end is where my car moves out pretty well... Just my. 02
ORIGINAL: Grabber
Thanks for the info guys.
OneFastEclipse- The term Belt-driven turbo is just the slang way of putting it. However, with my Vortech, at least the way the guys at Vortech explained this. Until I go into boost, the system actually "powers" my motor down, almost to completely stock form, for everyday driving, and improved gas mileage. IMO a turbo and a roots/Ts style blower are harder on a motor then a centri. But, I know Turbos are very efficient as well as ts/roots blowers. The only reason I say mine is, simply because until I hit 3K RPM, my car is practically stock.
Thanks for the info guys.
OneFastEclipse- The term Belt-driven turbo is just the slang way of putting it. However, with my Vortech, at least the way the guys at Vortech explained this. Until I go into boost, the system actually "powers" my motor down, almost to completely stock form, for everyday driving, and improved gas mileage. IMO a turbo and a roots/Ts style blower are harder on a motor then a centri. But, I know Turbos are very efficient as well as ts/roots blowers. The only reason I say mine is, simply because until I hit 3K RPM, my car is practically stock.
Fazm- Damn man, you drive too much. I've got close to 15K in one year. Damn!!!!!! Also, if someone did not have a lot of knowledge about turbos, and centri's, they'd think they were the same and operated. Sure, the angle of that pic is just showing the end of the blower/turbo you will see when looking at your engine. Flip it around, and it is totally different.
Also, I think the fastest my Vortech ever spun was 76,000 RPM, which was on the dyno, according to the data from the machine. I though that was fast, but damn, 150-200,000 RPM WTF!!!!!!!!! I think I am either doing a 4V swap with TT's, or building my 3V with a ST.
OneFastEclipse- What you mentioned about the TS VS. Centri is not exactly true. I race a buds Mach 1 twice from a roll, from about 45ish-60. He has an Eaton, 4.36 gears, and puts down 430, 400+ torque. This was before I got a lilttle boost in power with my mid-pipe. We hit it at the exact same time, he instantly put a half car, and after we hit 90, I stopped his pull, and I started to edge up to him to about 105 when he shut down. So, in most cases yes, TS/Roots could beat Centri's without extreme effort, but, us having similar power cars, and my setup with the tune I have, top end is where my car moves out pretty well... Just my. 02
If you are pulling on your friend up high it is probably because you are putting more peak power to the ground then he is. If he is putting 430hp to the tire and you are putting say 460hp to the tire, then in your peak power you would pull him in. This of course depends on a lot of other variables as well such as weight, gearing, etc.
That makes a lot of sense. I now know the commonalities and the differences.
On the dyno, on the first run, the Vortech was said by the data provided by the ECO and the CPU it was hooked up to, to spin at that speed. However, that was the initial run. Aftermath, it spins around 61,000 RPM and not really more. I boost 11.39 to be precise, but that is not at all much of a difference from 11.
My friend gets peak power at 2500 RPM. However, my power starts to peak at 4K RPM, that's why it took a bit to get moving to his level, and goes all the way to 7100 RPM where I hit my 439. He obviously has more torque then I. I think he puts down 430 WTQ. Similar weight, I had 20's on, he had smaller tires. Although, I had complete traction due to my awesome tires
. You are an awesome guy OneFastEclipse. Thanks again so much for the knowledge. Everyone else, thanks again.
On the dyno, on the first run, the Vortech was said by the data provided by the ECO and the CPU it was hooked up to, to spin at that speed. However, that was the initial run. Aftermath, it spins around 61,000 RPM and not really more. I boost 11.39 to be precise, but that is not at all much of a difference from 11.
My friend gets peak power at 2500 RPM. However, my power starts to peak at 4K RPM, that's why it took a bit to get moving to his level, and goes all the way to 7100 RPM where I hit my 439. He obviously has more torque then I. I think he puts down 430 WTQ. Similar weight, I had 20's on, he had smaller tires. Although, I had complete traction due to my awesome tires
. You are an awesome guy OneFastEclipse. Thanks again so much for the knowledge. Everyone else, thanks again.
Stop making turbos sound so damn good.[8D]If I had the money I would just buy a turbo kit for about 5 grand and leave the rest of the car stock. Did anybody see the 200,000 mile 5.0 with the turbo setup in MM&FF? They cranked it up to 13 lbs of boost and the car was putting 480 hp and over 500 ft. lbs. to the wheels. I figure 8 psiwould give me somewhat manageable power while keeping it well within the limits of the stock block and bottom end.


