Street/Strip Raced a guy from a light? Had that ride of yours on the timed track? Tell your story here.

347 STROKER KILL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 4, 2009 | 05:29 AM
  #11  
1999mustang2000's Avatar
1999mustang2000
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,583
From: HENDO,KY
Default

well i know for a fact he wasnt playin around you could tell by the sound of his exhaust when he punched it
Old Sep 4, 2009 | 06:06 AM
  #12  
bluebeastsrt's Avatar
bluebeastsrt
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 11,565
From: Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by 302army187
A half build 347 would have chewed you up and spit you out.

your making what? 260hp? maybe?

a MILD 347 would be 300hp at the wheel. theres plenty of guys with 350-375horse at the tire with nothing to crazy in there set up.

He might have just been playing with you, or just had his car set up like crap.


Im sure it was fun, and i guess you beat him if you call playing around a "race" but as stated it don't make sence.
First of all agreed. Doesn't make much sense. But I'm curious where you got those numbers from? In theory you could stroke a 1975 302cid motor to 347 and not even be making 300 crank HP, let alone at the wheels. Or a 5.0 liter from the late 80s GT will still only put out about 180 to 190 to the wheels stock. I think it'll take a bit more than just a bore & stroke and a 3 angle valve job to the heads to get near 300whp. I'm not breaking your ***** just wondering what you mean by Mild 347?
Old Sep 4, 2009 | 06:36 AM
  #13  
302army187's Avatar
302army187
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,395
From: colorado
Default

Originally Posted by bluebeastsrt
First of all agreed. Doesn't make much sense. But I'm curious where you got those numbers from? In theory you could stroke a 1975 302cid motor to 347 and not even be making 300 crank HP, let alone at the wheels. Or a 5.0 liter from the late 80s GT will still only put out about 180 to 190 to the wheels stock. I think it'll take a bit more than just a bore & stroke and a 3 angle valve job to the heads to get near 300whp. I'm not breaking your ***** just wondering what you mean by Mild 347?
I base most my 347 knowledge of Primetime5.0 in the 5.0 section. His last set up wasent anything TO extreme and it was a high 11 second car. His new set up which is pretty wild has him walking away from pretty modded 03 cobra's and head/cam LS1's.

Im talking about 205-225cc heads, pretty high lift/duration cam's, not real street frendly, and such.

not really "mild" but nothing nutty ether.
Old Sep 4, 2009 | 07:33 AM
  #14  
Projectquick's Avatar
Projectquick
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,445
From: Jersey
Default

A kid in town and his father built a 347 for his 66 coupe. He used a FRPP e-cam, stock mildly ported heads and a small 600-650 cfm carb. His car had a hard time out running stockish 5.0 foxes. People really do build *** backwards engines, so you never know.
Old Sep 4, 2009 | 12:58 PM
  #15  
83gtragtop's Avatar
83gtragtop
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,897
From: DTLA, CA
Default

Originally Posted by bluebeastsrt
First of all agreed. Doesn't make much sense. But I'm curious where you got those numbers from? In theory you could stroke a 1975 302cid motor to 347 and not even be making 300 crank HP, let alone at the wheels. Or a 5.0 liter from the late 80s GT will still only put out about 180 to 190 to the wheels stock. I think it'll take a bit more than just a bore & stroke and a 3 angle valve job to the heads to get near 300whp. I'm not breaking your ***** just wondering what you mean by Mild 347?
While what your saying is true, people do not invest $x,xxx's on their bottom end and then slap stock top end parts back on. That would be absolutely stupid.
Old Sep 4, 2009 | 01:34 PM
  #16  
bluebeastsrt's Avatar
bluebeastsrt
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 11,565
From: Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by 83gtragtop
While what your saying is true, people do not invest $x,xxx's on their bottom end and then slap stock top end parts back on. That would be absolutely stupid.
You haven't met my brother in law. lol. He'll cobble a motor together out of anything he can find. Your right, people dont intentionally set out to build their motor, paintjob, suspension, etc. wrong but it happens all the time. Sometimes it's just a matter of "oh ****" the machine shop work was more expensive than I expected. Guess I'll have to put the old heads on and skimp on the carb & intake.

Last edited by bluebeastsrt; Sep 4, 2009 at 01:37 PM.
Old Sep 4, 2009 | 01:38 PM
  #17  
67mustang302's Avatar
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,468
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by 83gtragtop
While what your saying is true, people do not invest $x,xxx's on their bottom end and then slap stock top end parts back on. That would be absolutely stupid.
Yes they do, I've seen people do it. There really are people out there that think that aftermarket aluminum heads don't work right on the street, or that stock heads are so great, or they think that it's nothing but cubes that make power and never take into account everything else. I've absolutely POUNDED guys with 400+ inch big blocks and strokers with my 302, simply because they run a stock headed, no cammed boat anchor. There's no replacement for displacement is mostly true(rpm replaces it but cubes run better and make power more easily) but it's not JUST cubes that make power. Stock 302 heads on a 408 is still gonna make stock 302 power, the only thing stroking does with a stock engine is move the power curve lower into the rpm range, that's all.
Old Sep 4, 2009 | 01:55 PM
  #18  
ChalknCover's Avatar
ChalknCover
Sgt. Killjoy
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,090
From: DMV
Default

That had to feel good.
Old Sep 4, 2009 | 03:04 PM
  #19  
bluebeastsrt's Avatar
bluebeastsrt
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 11,565
From: Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by 67mustang302
Yes they do, I've seen people do it. There really are people out there that think that aftermarket aluminum heads don't work right on the street, or that stock heads are so great, or they think that it's nothing but cubes that make power and never take into account everything else. I've absolutely POUNDED guys with 400+ inch big blocks and strokers with my 302, simply because they run a stock headed, no cammed boat anchor. There's no replacement for displacement is mostly true(rpm replaces it but cubes run better and make power more easily) but it's not JUST cubes that make power. Stock 302 heads on a 408 is still gonna make stock 302 power, the only thing stroking does with a stock engine is move the power curve lower into the rpm range, that's all.
That's right! it's more about how much fuel and air you can stuff in the motor instead of just how many cubes you have.
Old Sep 4, 2009 | 05:46 PM
  #20  
67mustang302's Avatar
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,468
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by bluebeastsrt
That's right! it's more about how much fuel and air you can stuff in the motor instead of just how many cubes you have.
Exactly. Formula 1 cars are a perfect example, 145 cubic inches and they make almost 800hp n/a, they just have to turn 18,000rpm to do it. But it gets the air and fuel in there regardless.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Matt's 95 Stang
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
2
Oct 5, 2015 07:16 AM
Brett Ludlow
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
7
Sep 23, 2015 06:59 AM
Sminemann
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
7
Sep 17, 2015 09:24 AM
EASTIDEE123
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
5
Sep 15, 2015 11:08 AM
EASTIDEE123
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
14
Sep 14, 2015 03:52 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 AM.