SVT Forums

cams

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 11:16 AM
  #21  
xxkazp3rxx's Avatar
xxkazp3rxx
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,893
From: Florida
Default

you're talking about a supercharged car... the car we're talking about is a NA 4v..

Also are those graphs from a person, or done by a company doing "research"?
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 03:11 PM
  #22  
JTanew's Avatar
JTanew
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 143
From: where the Corps says
Default

the car isn't supercharged it N/A 4v without the eaton on it with the compression brought up. Its the ironblock not the alluminum or the WAP block.

the graphs are from Sean Hyland motorsports pretty straight cats
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 06:17 PM
  #23  
xxkazp3rxx's Avatar
xxkazp3rxx
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,893
From: Florida
Default

oh ok... how much work does it have done to it? Those gains are near unheard of for a car modified little...
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 05:29 AM
  #24  
JTanew's Avatar
JTanew
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 143
From: where the Corps says
Default

look at my last couple of post bro, i tell you that it is on an engine dyno and i give you the list of mods on the motor those number are from the flywheel.

Last edited by JTanew; Nov 3, 2008 at 05:31 AM. Reason: spelling
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 05:47 AM
  #25  
the_camo_snake's Avatar
the_camo_snake
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 242
From: Oklahoma
Default

Still that sounds mighty fishy to me. Did they say what octane of gas they used also. Before might be with 87 and with cams they might have put 100 octane and tuned accordingly. Inthe real world on a stock to mildly modified 4V those #s just arent plausible.
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 07:22 AM
  #26  
xxkazp3rxx's Avatar
xxkazp3rxx
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,893
From: Florida
Default

Thank you -- a voice of reason, lol...


I saw the information you put.. there's definatly more info then what we have with this car out there..
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 10:50 AM
  #27  
mfj's Avatar
mfj
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,463
From: AZ
Default

Yeah guys... We are not talking ls1's here, where u can easily get 50 rwhp with a decent cam...
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 05:48 PM
  #28  
JTanew's Avatar
JTanew
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 143
From: where the Corps says
Default

They are using pump gas w/ the eve1 39lbs injectors...but ya could be right. there is full ported heads and full ported intake w/ extreme energy cams. also no accesories because of the engine dyno. running though LTs. the numbers sound about right to me.

Kazp i hear what you are saying about the car. only one can hope that we can squeeze out as much as an ls1 one day w/ as many companies are regring their own cams
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
19
Dec 19, 2023 01:12 PM
patchshaffer
Tuner Central
3
Oct 5, 2015 02:24 PM
uedlose
The Racers Bench
4
Oct 1, 2015 08:31 PM
junior04
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
Sep 28, 2015 10:53 AM
Ryan Fitzpatrick
New Member Area
3
Sep 14, 2015 02:21 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:50 AM.