V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs Technical discussions on the 3.8L and 3.9L V6 torque monsters

Next mod

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 2, 2006 | 01:59 PM
  #21  
mustangman02232's Avatar
mustangman02232
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,865
From: Ludlow, Mass
Default RE: Next mod


ORIGINAL: jthorn9


ORIGINAL: mustangman02232


ORIGINAL: jthorn9

Then get a GT, J/K, remember, start small and work your way up. That's always the best path to follow, both in life and on cars.
yes go from the slowest V-6 to the slowest V-8
Last time I checked the sn95 5.0Ls are way faster than the Mustang IIs, decently faster than the 4 eyes, and just as fast as a foxbody, but hey, my cars not stock so[:'(]
well its still a dog, and atleast you didnt waste the money on an NPI[:'(]
Old Sep 2, 2006 | 02:30 PM
  #22  
jthorn9's Avatar
jthorn9
The Godfather
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 15,480
From: Temple, Texas
Default RE: Next mod

Well that's one thing I made damn sure I didn't do was get a NPI, damn those things are pathettic until they're moded. Oh, you're damn right I'm a dog, I'd rather be a dog than a ***** any day.[8D]
Old Sep 2, 2006 | 02:33 PM
  #23  
Jugador's Avatar
Jugador
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,840
From: Bangladesh
Default RE: Next mod

who said you werent a *****, he was just saying your car's a dog [8D]
kidding


but just so you know, this kind of talk about your 5.0 this your gt that is what people find annoying at times...
Old Sep 2, 2006 | 02:39 PM
  #24  
nanaki's Avatar
nanaki
Retired MF Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,891
Default RE: Next mod

ORIGINAL: jthorn9

Well that's one thing I made damn sure I didn't do was get a NPI, damn those things are pathettic until they're moded. Oh, you're damn right I'm a dog, I'd rather be a dog than a ***** any day.[8D]
the NPI GTs are a lil faster than you, ya know.
Old Sep 2, 2006 | 02:53 PM
  #25  
jthorn9's Avatar
jthorn9
The Godfather
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 15,480
From: Temple, Texas
Default RE: Next mod

Last time I looked it's nearly half a second slower in the 0-60, and .2-.5s slower in the 1/4. There have been private list of people running 14.5-14.7s with stock 94-95 5.0Ls on a few other sites, best I've seen with a NPI GT was 14.9s.

Yea, I know juggy, but that's just how I refer to the car, I've always refered to my old sixer as either the Stang, or the Sixer, I've always refered to GTs as GTs, so when I mention my car I'm gonna call it what I've always called it, the GT, it's not to rub it in anybodys face because even the old 4 bangers are mustangs as it's not what's under the hood that counts, it's the person behind the wheel.
Old Sep 2, 2006 | 04:18 PM
  #26  
mustangman02232's Avatar
mustangman02232
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,865
From: Ludlow, Mass
Default RE: Next mod


ORIGINAL: jthorn9

Last time I looked it's nearly half a second slower in the 0-60, and .2-.5s slower in the 1/4. There have been private list of people running 14.5-14.7s with stock 94-95 5.0Ls on a few other sites, best I've seen with a NPI GT was 14.9s.

Yea, I know juggy, but that's just how I refer to the car, I've always refered to my old sixer as either the Stang, or the Sixer, I've always refered to GTs as GTs, so when I mention my car I'm gonna call it what I've always called it, the GT, it's not to rub it in anybodys face because even the old 4 bangers are mustangs as it's not what's under the hood that counts, it's the person behind the wheel.
spoken like someone whos never owned one[&o]
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Stone629
The Racers Bench
66
Jun 2, 2016 09:52 PM
UrS4
S197 Handling Section
10
Oct 3, 2015 06:23 AM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
0
Oct 1, 2015 10:29 AM
TimeLord101
New Member Area
2
Oct 1, 2015 06:40 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:41 AM.