difference
ORIGINAL: jthorn9
Damn, look at all the bad info. The Ford T-Lok was designed to handle roughly 300 rwhp, after that they would have a tendency to shatter under the pressure. They're good up to 250, but after that they get a little iffy.
Damn, look at all the bad info. The Ford T-Lok was designed to handle roughly 300 rwhp, after that they would have a tendency to shatter under the pressure. They're good up to 250, but after that they get a little iffy.
the 7.5 T-lok is nothing but a stock replacement part# for Bronco II's and Rangers that came with the anemic 2.9L V6 which made 120flywheel hp and was a T-lok option for them.
why do you think ford didn't use the 7.5 in the GT????? because the 7.5 T-lok is weak as hell and they didn't want to issue recalls on blown differentials on their mustangs.
the open differential or T-lok which is the same except with 2 Ssprings and clutch packs are weak as hell. the spyder gears a small ans weak with little support. they have been known to shed spyder gear teeth on stock 5spds with hard launches.
hell i have even broke 8.8 stock T-loks too with just stock 98 cobra power.
the t-lok really isn't a strong design 7.5 or 8.8.
the T-lok was never designed to handle 300rwhp. if you think they were please show me proof
ORIGINAL: cobra232
hell i have even broke 8.8 stock T-loks too with just stock 98 cobra power.
ORIGINAL: jthorn9
Damn, look at all the bad info. The Ford T-Lok was designed to handle roughly 300 rwhp, after that they would have a tendency to shatter under the pressure. They're good up to 250, but after that they get a little iffy.
Damn, look at all the bad info. The Ford T-Lok was designed to handle roughly 300 rwhp, after that they would have a tendency to shatter under the pressure. They're good up to 250, but after that they get a little iffy.
i broke my buddies in his stock mach 1 in the middle of a donut[8D]
btw do you have a link for that just cause im sick of hearing everyone it the 2005-2007 section give bullsh*t how the t-lok is the greatest thing ever and the detroit isnt worth the money
ORIGINAL: africkanV6
the best way to end all of this is ....forget teh tlok and get a damn truetrac. lol
the best way to end all of this is ....forget teh tlok and get a damn truetrac. lol
ORIGINAL: jovez
well exactly why i made the thread. Why spend ~$500 when you can get away with ~$200 with the Tlok. Facts are what i was lookin for.
ORIGINAL: africkanV6
the best way to end all of this is ....forget teh tlok and get a damn truetrac. lol
the best way to end all of this is ....forget teh tlok and get a damn truetrac. lol
ORIGINAL: jovez
Everyone is always endorsing the Detroit T-lok. whats the difference from that to Ford Racing T-Lok Differential(beside the price tag)?
http://www.v6mustangstuff.com/drivetrain2.htm
http://www.drivetrainspecialists.com...-75/index.html
Everyone is always endorsing the Detroit T-lok. whats the difference from that to Ford Racing T-Lok Differential(beside the price tag)?
http://www.v6mustangstuff.com/drivetrain2.htm
http://www.drivetrainspecialists.com...-75/index.html


