V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs Technical discussions on the 3.8L and 3.9L V6 torque monsters

V6 vs 5L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 1, 2008 | 11:27 PM
  #11  
MU71L4710N's Avatar
MU71L4710N
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,189
From:
Default RE: V6 vs 5L

ORIGINAL: super6wheelman

From my point of view each has its own rewards

V6 (99-03) 5.0 (87-93)
Looks better Sounds better
Handels bettermore performance parts availible
Better MPGMore HP for the $$
5-lug standard215hp standard

I just dont know-help would be greatly appreciated
or go with a 94-95 5.0 cuz i like those body styles alot more than the notch/fox body. if your aiming for the 5-600hp range i would not go for a v6. would be much easier to get the 5.0 up to those numbers (and parts for those are cheap). no offence to the 6 guys i know alot of them have some fast v6's...but i doubt any of them are pushing anywhere near 500-600 horsepower. find a cheap 5.0, build the engine a little and put a blower on it (youll also have to get supporting mods like clutch, fuel, tranny, rear end, and probably driveshaft to support that along with maybe a few other things).

13k would be a nice down payment on a 03/04 cobra also leaving you probably less than 10 grand to pay off which isnt bad. few boltons can easily put the cobra at 500rwhp with an engine/drivetrain already built for abuse.
Old Mar 2, 2008 | 10:00 AM
  #12  
tealpony's Avatar
tealpony
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6
From:
Default RE: V6 vs 5L

ORIGINAL: MU71L4710N

no offence to the 6 guys i know alot of them have some fast v6's...but i doubt any of them are pushing anywhere near 500-600 horsepower.
Of course there are! You'll have to rebuild and go all out and a turbo to do it though. Definitely not impossible. Seems there was at least one with a 3.8L too.
Old Mar 2, 2008 | 10:28 AM
  #13  
ESG-642T's Avatar
ESG-642T
Buyer Beware
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,586
Default RE: V6 vs 5L

ORIGINAL: MU71L4710N

ORIGINAL: super6wheelman

From my point of view each has its own rewards

V6 (99-03) 5.0 (87-93)
Looks better Sounds better
Handels bettermore performance parts availible
Better MPGMore HP for the $$
5-lug standard215hp standard

I just dont know-help would be greatly appreciated
or go with a 94-95 5.0 cuz i like those body styles alot more than the notch/fox body. if your aiming for the 5-600hp range i would not go for a v6. would be much easier to get the 5.0 up to those numbers (and parts for those are cheap). no offence to the 6 guys i know alot of them have some fast v6's...but i doubt any of them are pushing anywhere near 500-600 horsepower. find a cheap 5.0, build the engine a little and put a blower on it (youll also have to get supporting mods like clutch, fuel, tranny, rear end, and probably driveshaft to support that along with maybe a few other things).

13k would be a nice down payment on a 03/04 cobra also leaving you probably less than 10 grand to pay off which isnt bad. few boltons can easily put the cobra at 500rwhp with an engine/drivetrain already built for abuse.
500 is cake....
You have to be pushing 600-700 to play with the big boys.
Old Mar 2, 2008 | 10:35 AM
  #14  
LilRoush's Avatar
LilRoush
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,540
From: South FL
Default RE: V6 vs 5L

ORIGINAL: MU71L4710N

....no offence to the 6 guys i know alot of them have some fast v6's...but i doubt any of them are pushing anywhere near 500-600 horsepower......
Where have you been lately?


I say if you are going to be running around being loud, acting annoying and racing Hondas - get a V8 and be done. V6 owners already have a bad enough reputation.
Old Mar 2, 2008 | 12:59 PM
  #15  
cobra232's Avatar
cobra232
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,594
From:
Default RE: V6 vs 5L

ORIGINAL: LilRoush

ORIGINAL: MU71L4710N

....no offence to the 6 guys i know alot of them have some fast v6's...but i doubt any of them are pushing anywhere near 500-600 horsepower......
Where have you been lately?


I say if you are going to be running around being loud, acting annoying and racing Hondas - get a V8 and be done. V6 owners already have a bad enough reputation.
exactly.

your car is 500ish or was
Gary,Matt,J,Justin are all in the 450-just under 700rwhp level as well as many others.

my take on $13,000 at hand??

hard one. myself i would sink it into the 6 but that's me. i like to be different and prve people wrong about the "V8" or it aint **** urban ledgend. many of these guy's don't remember turbo buicks because they were not born yet or still hanging on a tit.

ford 3.8 is everybit as capable if not more than the turbo buick for making power which i seem to remember the buicks mopping the floor of 5.0's back in the day.

$13,000
4.2L crank
long rods from SSM to make it a 4.3 with better rod stroke geometry
heavily ported heads/custom intake
T70 (big T70)or T80 turbo or GT45R
Delk girdle
8.5:1 slugs
matt spec'd cam
built C4 with a 9" rear and 3500 stall with 3.50 gears
80lb Siemens injectors
SSM/Comp 1.7 rockers

all taking 25psi and most likely making 600+at the wheels
Old Mar 2, 2008 | 01:08 PM
  #16  
ESG-642T's Avatar
ESG-642T
Buyer Beware
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,586
Default RE: V6 vs 5L

I think a 9" is over kill...
Same with that turbo if he wants something to have fun on the street.
Old Mar 2, 2008 | 01:15 PM
  #17  
Hollister Hoodlum's Avatar
Hollister Hoodlum
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,229
From: Wah-Cheeta, KS
Default RE: V6 vs 5L

I love my fox.

and it always turns heads, not as common around here as the new edge mustangs. and it sounds great.

as for problems, yes you might run into a few more problems with a foxbody, but they aren't that bad. IMO


Old Mar 2, 2008 | 01:57 PM
  #18  
LilRoush's Avatar
LilRoush
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,540
From: South FL
Default RE: V6 vs 5L

Matt and Gary are both over 600 to the wheels. Gary will be over 700 when his car gets tuned. Matt hasn't released his new set up yet, but it's a larger turbo and new plumbing.
Old Mar 2, 2008 | 02:50 PM
  #19  
super6wheelman's Avatar
super6wheelman
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 264
From: CT
Default RE: V6 vs 5L

I forgot to factor in the age of the 5L and the fact it might have rust and corrosion. Bummer

In order to make a 99-03 V6 weild 400-500hp (or possibly higher) Do you have to go Turbo??
Old Mar 2, 2008 | 03:12 PM
  #20  
ESG-642T's Avatar
ESG-642T
Buyer Beware
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,586
Default RE: V6 vs 5L

ORIGINAL: super6wheelman

I forgot to factor in the age of the 5L and the fact it might have rust and corrosion. Bummer

In order to make a 99-03 V6 weild 400-500hp (or possibly higher) Do you have to go Turbo??

Nah, theirs this guy with a white snow plow v6 who hit it with an m112...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:22 AM.