Eaton M112 Roots Supercharger Vs. Procharger Cantrifugal Supercharger

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

06-16-2009, 10:30 AM

#11

LilRoush

6th Gear Member

Join Date: Feb 2007

Location: South FL

Posts: 8,540

You do realize that low psi M112 applications don't need the intercooler on our cars, and it would actually impede airflow coming off the blower.

06-16-2009, 11:47 AM

#12

RyansQuick6

Reverse Gear Member

Join Date: Dec 2006

Location: Baton Rouge, LA

Posts: 8,130

Quote:

Originally Posted by red02mustang

There is a guy on 3.8Mustang who is building a Kit that comes with all the parts except a taller hood and a psi gage. The intercooler he is still working on. One thing I just found out is the Procharger fits without having to move anything and bolt it or weld it to another part. I think its called OEM.

NO, there's no point. It's easier to install a whipple than it is to try to intercool an eaton.

P.S., Most of us that know about this topic know of everybody with a kit, a kit in the works, plans to redisign the kit, and people hoping to own the kit, regardless of what site they're on lol

06-16-2009, 04:07 PM

#13

LilRoush

6th Gear Member

Join Date: Feb 2007

Location: South FL

Posts: 8,540

I thought the M112'd V6 was just a rumor and some good photoshop work???

06-16-2009, 09:18 PM

#14

RyansQuick6

Reverse Gear Member

Join Date: Dec 2006

Location: Baton Rouge, LA

Posts: 8,130

Way to just let the secret out to everyone *******!

BTW, answer your damn phone!

06-17-2009, 07:47 AM

#15

red02mustang

1st Gear Member

Thread Starter

Join Date: May 2007

Posts: 94

Haha, ok I think I'm still gonna go with an Eaton. Mainly because the Procharger isn't covered under the warranty if I mod the engine, which I'm going to do. Also the eaton looks better and is alot cheaper too.

Last edited by red02mustang; 06-17-2009 at 07:55 AM.