2000 V6 vs 98 GT

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jul 6, 2005 | 07:15 PM

#31

PipsBlackStang

4th Gear Member

Joined: Jul 2004

Posts: 1,133

From:

RE: 2000 V6 vs 98 GT

Quote:

Yes but the pre 99s have 2.73 gears. I believe that he could have taken it. Also anyone ever seen Horsepower TV on spike, the guy Joe has a 96 4.6 called project "nightmare" that when stock dynoed at 155 r.w.h.p, but it was with over 100k on it. The 99-04 V-6s dyno around 165 r.w.h.p depending on tranny, and they have 3.27 gears.

Well I have a 3L27 rear end which means I have 3.27's with a T-lok from the factory.

Jul 6, 2005 | 11:44 PM

#32

PipsBlackStang

4th Gear Member

Joined: Jul 2004

Posts: 1,133

From:

RE: 2000 V6 vs 98 GT

Quote:

Nah man them 90s gt's arent quick at all. They got what like 220 horses. I can beat my boys 02 Gt and he got an borla exhaust. But i am a betta driver then him. I used to race this fat chic with a stock 02 mustang GT and I had like an intake and a flowmaster and thats it and i could stay with her car all the way to 2nd gear.

You gota drive it like you stold it

I just noticed what you posted....Your friend eighter drives like a bitch or you are lieing your *** off. I personaly think both and Im pretty sure everyone agrees

And all the way to 2nd gear??? WOW! Thats impressive! Did she shift at 3K into 2nd?

Jul 8, 2005 | 02:08 PM

#33

StangFastIsBack

Thread Starter

Joined: May 2005

Posts: 23

From:

RE: 2000 V6 vs 98 GT

Man u just jealous cuz your rides are beat!

Jul 8, 2005 | 02:24 PM

#34

mustangman02232

6th Gear Member

Joined: Dec 2004

Posts: 15,865

From: Ludlow, Mass

RE: 2000 V6 vs 98 GT

Quote:

Yes but the pre 99s have 2.73 gears.

Quote:

Well I have a 3L27 rear end which means I have 3.27's with a T-lok from the factory

There was an option for the 3.27s.

Jul 8, 2005 | 02:30 PM

#35

nanaki

Retired MF Moderator

Joined: Aug 2004

Posts: 14,891

RE: 2000 V6 vs 98 GT

Quote:

ORIGINAL: PipsBlackStang

Quote:

I just noticed what you posted....Your friend eighter drives like a bitch or you are lieing your *** off. I personaly think both and Im pretty sure everyone agrees

And all the way to 2nd gear??? WOW! Thats impressive! Did she shift at 3K into 2nd?

hahaha.. no kidding. oh, and yeah, 220HP vs 192HP. GT has you there. 300lbs of torque vs 225lbs of torque. he has you there too. yeah, he was definately slower than you.

Quote:

yeah ill run ya...r u from pa?

i'd run ya if you ever had to come to northern va or southern md for something. don't go out of your way though.

Jul 8, 2005 | 08:53 PM

#36

PipsBlackStang

4th Gear Member

Joined: Jul 2004

Posts: 1,133

From:

RE: 2000 V6 vs 98 GT

Quote:

Man u just jealous cuz your rides are beat!

HAHAHAHAHA .......Well little man you have much to learn. Heres what should be the last post in this thread.
1. He wasnt racing so yes you went by him
2. You are lieing and you should feel much shame for doing so and trying to get away with it on a mustang forum.
3. Just try to have fun on here and dont be jealous just because both of my cars would hand you your own *** in a nice wrapped package

Jul 9, 2005 | 01:45 AM

#37

StangFastIsBack

Thread Starter

Joined: May 2005

Posts: 23

From:

RE: 2000 V6 vs 98 GT

Yo man your crazy im not about to come on here and make **** up. Im 22 and work over 60 hours a wekk I got alot of better **** to do then make up fake racing stories. And heres the facts PACO this dude had a late 90's gt, prolly an auto and 2 heads in the car with maybe just sum crappy exhuats. And theres me a good driver with like 20 differnt mods man I got alot of **** even a 150 shot thats not really fully functional.

And the dude new we were racing cuz after I beat him he drove by and nodded. Then he followed me to me house which kinda freaked me out and backed out my driveway. What a wierdo...but anyway I wont 2 times fair and square.