V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs Technical discussions on the 3.8L and 3.9L V6 torque monsters

Flywheel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 5, 2012 | 10:12 AM
  #1  
Sweet_Lou's Avatar
Sweet_Lou
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 13
From: WA
Default Flywheel

I have a stage 3 clutch ordered and then found out from my uncle that I should probably change the flywheel at the same time since I will have it accessible. here is my question, on the 94 v6 is there an actual replacement flywheel or is it just a ring? what should I get as a replacement? I am pretty sure, from what I have been able to find, that whichever it is, its 164 tooth. correct?

Last edited by Sweet_Lou; Sep 5, 2012 at 03:32 PM. Reason: I found the answer elsewhere
Old Sep 8, 2012 | 10:10 AM
  #2  
LilRoush's Avatar
LilRoush
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,540
From: South FL
Default

Why such an aggressive clutch?
Just have you stock flywheel resurfaced. No need to replace it.
Old Sep 10, 2012 | 11:18 AM
  #3  
Sweet_Lou's Avatar
Sweet_Lou
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 13
From: WA
Default

Originally Posted by LilRoush
Why such an aggressive clutch?
you can do the job of a little knife with a big one, but you cant do the job of a big knife with a little one. =)
Old Sep 10, 2012 | 01:02 PM
  #4  
LilRoush's Avatar
LilRoush
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,540
From: South FL
Default

Actually, over doing 'performance' without need will hurt you. So you end up working against yourself. It's also a big waste of money.
Old Sep 11, 2012 | 10:25 AM
  #5  
Sweet_Lou's Avatar
Sweet_Lou
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 13
From: WA
Default

I dont understand your comment in this context. I assure you I am not being a jerk when I say that or ask the following. how can putting in more clutch than I actually need be an issue? I could understand if I was putting a supercharger on my 186k mile engine without even doing a rebuild, much less adding forged internals.

I admit my ignorance in matters of performance, but I figured a clutch upgrade wouldnt be detrimental to the project.
Old Sep 11, 2012 | 05:33 PM
  #6  
LilRoush's Avatar
LilRoush
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,540
From: South FL
Default

If you have a street car, a basic clutch will work better 95% of the time for applications like this. Heavy duty clutches are designed to take the heat and abuse of a track car...not the way a street car is driven. That, and they are also a lot less money.

It's kind of similar to guys who run mondo size brakes on the street. Sure they work great on the track and you look like a race car. But they work great in high temp / extreme conditions like they are designed for. On the street you don't get enough heat into them to stop safely. Instead, standard off the shelf brakes will stop shorter when at cooler operating temps on the street compared to the big track style brakes.
Old Sep 11, 2012 | 05:37 PM
  #7  
TRexGAWD's Avatar
TRexGAWD
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,761
From: Georgia
Default

It's also going to be a pain in the a$$ driving around the street with such a heavy clutch.. the bite you'll get from every light, every stop sign.. there's no give, it's full on-full off
Old Sep 11, 2012 | 05:49 PM
  #8  
Sweet_Lou's Avatar
Sweet_Lou
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 13
From: WA
Default

both of those are great explanations, I appreciate the information.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
6bangr
4.6L V8 Technical Discussions
5
Feb 15, 2016 07:40 AM
junior04
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
Sep 28, 2015 10:53 AM
dudeguy421
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
4
Sep 24, 2015 11:16 AM
ccdguy
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
1
Sep 19, 2015 05:20 PM
ponyride00
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
0
Aug 12, 2015 01:57 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 AM.