MagnaFlow vs. Flowmaster
12-22-2005, 05:48 PM
#21
I ♥ Acer
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location:
Posts: 528
RE: MagnaFlow vs. Flowmaster
ORIGINAL: babygurl2000
i have the GT takeoff from the catback with 40 series flomaster
wanna hear it?
clicky the link
http://www.gotstang.com/profile.php?babygurl2000&page=1
i have the GT takeoff from the catback with 40 series flomaster
wanna hear it?
clicky the link
http://www.gotstang.com/profile.php?babygurl2000&page=1
OH! so you're the one....."While we're young."
12-23-2005, 02:00 AM
#24
RE: MagnaFlow vs. Flowmaster
We'll I'll add my two cents in and say go with Mags, know the old flows sucked, royally, but the new ones aren't too bad, I prefer my sound better, but that's just me. Now on a GT, mags have the best overall performance, but the difference between brands is at best, 3-4 hp, so not that much difference. Me if I didn't have much money I'd take my gamble on flows as Harveys set up, yellowponey, sounds nice, I have herd some that really suck. But if I had the spare cash I'd get mags because you know your getting the best there.
12-23-2005, 02:11 PM
#26
RE: MagnaFlow vs. Flowmaster
Well I'm going to cover my *** and say 3-4 hp "at best" off the flywheel, reread my first post, man no more beer for you, but yea, 1-2 rwhp, would be the maximum difference to the rear wheels.
12-23-2005, 02:22 PM
#28
RE: MagnaFlow vs. Flowmaster
Damn your good today, you must of had a little fun last night.
But yet again, that's maximum, I'm in total agreement with you, but I do like to add in a little extra room for varriation, sorry, I look at things with a scientific eye, so I always add in room for varitation, so if my figures sound a little high at times, it because I take in account varitions caused by outside by factors. Oh, and I almost always include something like, "maximum" "at best" and other phases to show that's the best you'll get, just go behind me when you see this and give real world figures, so that people can see both sides. OOOOpppppsssss, another long post.
But yet again, that's maximum, I'm in total agreement with you, but I do like to add in a little extra room for varriation, sorry, I look at things with a scientific eye, so I always add in room for varitation, so if my figures sound a little high at times, it because I take in account varitions caused by outside by factors. Oh, and I almost always include something like, "maximum" "at best" and other phases to show that's the best you'll get, just go behind me when you see this and give real world figures, so that people can see both sides. OOOOpppppsssss, another long post.